psychiatrists, clinical manual of psycholegalanalysis, Freud, psychonalysis, law and psychiatry
Introductory Presentations in Neuroscience in Psychiatry

(c) 5GL Software, Australia, 370 Jettys by the Lake, Windang, NSW, 2528, Australia
 emails admin@5glsoftware.org, med5gl@pacific.net.au; mobile (Australia) 0431 741 233
Medical Diagnosis Expert System and Neuroscience Research

Links to presentation 2
Relevant documents

a)    Alzheimer’s Scam Report
b)    Clinical Manual of Psycholegalanalysis (CMPL)



IMAGINE yourself sitting in a large lecture room at University. A man at the front in a suit gives the presentations. He has an assistant, a woman in a light red ladies business suit.


Presentation 1 – The Beginning

1.1 Ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to introductory lectures in a proposed new medical science titled psycholegalanalysis. This science comes under a larger umbrella titled Neuroscience in Psychiatry. Psycholegalanalysis is very specific and, if you study psychiatry, in a way straightforward, however, the umbrella of the science under which it logically belongs is not so straightforward.

1.2 Consider medicine. Anatomy is a critical part of medicine. I have named this new proposed medical science as Neuroscience in Psychiatry because while much input is used from psychiatry, I tend to use only that input which I can map onto the brain directly.  There is much more in psychiatry than I found a way of using, simply because I could not work out the brain process, be it a theoretical process, that was involved. Without doubt, as the science improves, my initial dependence on relating everything to how the brain works may prove not so necessary.

1.3 At University, I studied science, majoring in mathematics and physics and computer science. The first years of my career was with the Department of Health in their computing sections. Besides computer programming, there is no other field of knowledge as far as I know that can form in the brain association areas that think and work in terms of bits and bytes. Eventually, after twenty or so years developing the 5GL-Doctor medical diagnosis expert system, the medical diagnosis areas in my brain may be unique in that these tend to put medicine together in terms of bits and bytes. However, I do not believe this uniqueness of my medical diagnosis association areas is necessary for the medical diagnosis areas to manage the process of psycholegalanalysis.

1.4 What is the new proposed science about? Perhaps the simplest explanation is about mapping the truth from myths and fables. Is a politician presenting a point of view being truthful? Is a court of law presenting a judgment consistent with the actual law? If a politician is not presenting truth, are they lying? If you have ever worked with high quality door to door salesmen you may come to the conclusion that what are lies to observers, are not lies to such people but the “skill” they develop in “getting a foot” in the door. What is the truth? Is such a person lying – or has their unconscious lost notion of what a lie is when it comes to survival in their work?

1.5 What about psychopaths who are serial killers? Sometimes doctors are asked to determine if such a psychopath knew right from wrong. Sometimes doctors conclude that such must have because they ran away from the scene of the crime. Superficial thinking. The human brain has many smart areas, none of which may understand right or wrong, but some of which may understand an action a person will be in trouble for and so run away.

1.6 The field of psychiatry accepts cultural biases and differences as normal within a particular culture. Such are not a mark of, for want of better term, insanity. However, Neuroscience in Psychiatry explains that there are cultural groups in society that also may work different to others. It would be incorrect, from a clinical point of view, to label a police officer or magistrate as corrupt if what they have done is something accepted in their subculture. As wrong as labelling a door to door salesman as a liar and fraudster just because what some do is not acceptable to an observer (but is acceptable to the subculture of door to door salesmen).

1.7 Neuroscience in Psychiatry, specifically psycholegalanalysis, attempts to study the unconscious in such a way as to yield a medical diagnosis which are known as conclusions. Is a person lying or not? Is a person corrupt or not? Such things are not readily understood relative to some subcultures such as lawyers, politicians, door to door salesmen. (It is most unlikely a politician will tell a blatant lie, rather he or she will use words in a manner that mask truth).

1.8 Neuroscience in psychiatry is very much about finding the unconscious clues and putting them through a filter, the process of psycholegalanalysis, and allow this process to yield conclusions. A person must have sound medical diagnosis areas in the brain for the process to work properly. I would think that only medical doctors in particular psychiatrists can truly work with this science. There are exceptions, such as myself, being people who develop strong medical diagnosis association areas in the brain while not medical doctors as such, but this would surely be an extreme exception.

1.9 Freud, the father of psychoanalysis, pointed out that 2/3 of the psyche is in the unconscious. The story of F.A. Kekule, the founder of modern chemistry, clearly shows how powerful the unconscious is. It can think much better than the conscious, however, presenting the information from the unconscious to the conscious is not easy.

1.10 Consider a word such as “politics”. How does a person understand this? The brain links to images of politicians, government, all manner of things. The number of links in the brain are enormous. Where the activity of the brain is, there I AM.

1.11 While there is an area at the front of the brain known as the anterior cingulate cortex which is associated with the self or “I”, any major part of the brain when active results in an active energy system that is a consciousness in its own right. A state of mind formed from wide associations in the brain results in an “I AM” consciousness which understands no other point of view except those aspects that gave it birth. Consider a strong toothache. Nothing but the pain matters! A tough active association area in the brain will dominate other areas.

1.12 The left brain is the dominant brain in all of us.  While there are exceptions to the structure of the brain, we will use a typical model in these presentations. Thus for this discussion assume the left brain is the two-dimensional brain while the right is the three-dimensional brain. In these presentations we are also talking about the normal brain as distinct from one which may have neurological deficits such as in dementia, or which may become active in different ways to normal brains such as the brain of a psychopath. (to minimise complications at this point, we also refrain from thinking of brain’s that may have dyslexia or a thought disorder or similar).

1.13 Words are an important tool in the modern world. Such are used to communicate, however, sometimes such communication is shallow. Psychologists define their own terms which label people; lawyers do the same; many aspects of society do much the same. Not only do some specialist lawyers invent certain “patterns” and try to sell these to a jury, some may actually believe their own inventions! Example. Consider the Islamic advertisement executive taken to court by the Catholic Church not pleased with an ad campaign. The lawyer can invent all manner of reason why this person is “prejudiced” against Catholics and will try to sell a jury that as the reason for the ads failing – that this was intentional on the part of the executive. In a world more prone to being “insulted” by the actions of another, in a world more prone to developing specialist lawyers than can find all manner of actions which they then can contribute to say “malice”, a natural defence is important. Neuroscience in Psychiatry offers such a defence.

1.14 Such labels and definitions can blind us to facts and truth. I recall a person who became separated after thirty years of marriage due to his former wife’s mental breakdown. He went to an employment agency to help him find work. Standard questions were asked including marital relationship. The person explained but the person behind the desk did not want to know all this, all she wanted was to tick a box which said that either this person was capable of a relationship or was not. She then ticked the box “relationship problems”. (30 years of marriage and relationship problems? Defies rational sense!)

1.15 These standard slots into which people from all walks of life are put into by different groups, how do they arise? Many arise from legal definitions. Not so much those laws defined by government but by the courts. These people are into words and how to define everything. These people are not into long tales and a thorough assessment of a situation - they want to categorise everything using words and phrases which to them says it all.

1.16 There is big big difference between the need for names of car parts, for example, and the need to label people. Without a complex naming convention for parts of a car, no one may be able to put a car together. But, when it comes to understanding the psyche and soul and a person, the opposite holds true. The more we label aspects of personality or behaviour, the more risk there is that what we end up with may have no relationship to truth or facts or evidence.

1.17 However, labelling people and actions is so common, especially in law, that Neuroscience in Psychiatry was developed in parts to come to grips with how does this work in the brain. How does the state of mind form that knows how to label people or actions? What are the anchors of such a state of mind? Is such a rational state of mind or not?

1.18 The major importance of this science is to understand a real life situation. That is the Alzheimer’s Scam as defined, and also a room full of mirrors in the Supreme Court of NSW that appears to be fraud after fraud to do with a Last Will and Testament.

1.19 An Expert Witness document prepared for that court in the case mentioned, explains all the specifics. Here is a person, a laywer, who invents one lie after another and pays $10,000 to a specialist legal firm to obtain a court order naming his Alzheimer’s mother “protected” from the true executor of the only legal Will in place. Then this person organizes a new Last Will and Testament and this is passed through a section of the court known as Probate Division - so for an investment of $10,000 this psychopath obtained for himself a property he otherwise would not have.

1.20 It is not a question of corruption. Sometimes such may happen of course but our science is not about such really. The person in question is a psychopath. His brain far more developed to process techniques of manipulation. Throughout his career as a lawyer, his brain would have seen a court of law as the perfect weapon for his special wants and needs. His brain would have worked out every possible way he could obtain court orders, what lies he could tell without anyone detecting such, and so on. His brain worked out how to use a court order to obtain exclusive access to a demented parent’s bank account. His brain worked out how to engineer a new Last Will and Testament. His brain worked out how to persuade a free public hospital geriatric specialist that his demented mother still had “testament capacity” and on this basis a new Last Will and Testament was engineered. These are not minor feats! (Unless this is a common and well known about scam, but even then, there is enough in the Alzheimer’s Scam report to see the genius of a psychopath who is a lawyer).

1.21 That psychopath brain has provided all the clues required for us to focus on understanding using a new medical science Neuroscience in Psychiatry. It was that brain that had worked out long before psycholegalanalysis had, that in those who are magistrates and judges, the “objective” state of mind is in fact an insane state of mind formed from delusions, fixations, and ideas of reference.

1.22 This is not so easy to appreciate in lawyers. However, consider a person who is unemployed. What assumptions are you likely to make? Lacks education? Lacks skills? Let us say the person is a medical doctor with much experience but suddenly can not find work even though there are many positions. What is the recruitment consultant to make of this? He or she assumes this person may have some criminal history or anger management issues or such along such lines. In other words, the state of mind that forms in that recruitment consultant is in fact a state of mind formed from delusions, fixations, and ideas of reference.

1.23 In summary, Neuroscience in Psychiatry is a study of the unconscious that gives birth to a state of mind. Psycholegalanalysis is a specific application of this science. Unlike psychiatry, Neuroscience in Psychiatry is not so much about determining a mental illness or a behavioural disorder, it is more to clinically define as correctly as possible certain actions and situations that on the surface may defy explanation or logic or reason.  The conclusions of psycholegalanalysis are legitimate and bona fide medical diagnoses because it is the medical diagnosis areas of the brain that are used to reach a conclusion. Now and then when a conclusion can not be reached, assertions can be put together from partial conclusions. Assertions are not diagnoses but more of an educated opinion.
 

Our Definition of Insanity


In a typical brain, the left and right cerebral hemispheres have different functions. Some people have atypical brains in the sense the roles of the left and right are reversed; or functions found in one brain are shared by both. The left and right brain are connected by a cell rich tissue known as the corpus callosum. This tissue is relatively larger in women. For the purpose of making this document as simple as possible, the typical brain is the model. Presented with an atypical brain, the neuroscientist needs to make adjustments to parts of this document. Of course, in persons such as psychopaths the brain can work differently too – this report does not consider such atypical or unusual brain activity patterns.









A split-brain is a person whose corpus callosum has been surgically severed. Studies of such patients have demonstrated that the typical left brain is purely 2-dimensional, while the right brain is 3-dimensional. Only the right can see in focus, the left attempts to explain that focus using sets of two dimensional arguments or descriptions. In the image, a split brain patient is asked to cover one of his eyes and draw what the eye sees. The nerves from the left eye connect to the right brain, and vice versa. The left brain simply can not see a three dimensional view. However, note the top picture? The right brain draws one window instead of a number. The right brain while able to see a picture as a whole does not see in the manner of the left brain. Only together can the two brains perceive adequately. (Note that the same can be observed in brain damage patients. Also note that this is a picture from one patient, and because the left and right brain can be atypical and share functions, it may be possible to find a split brain patient who in fact will draw three windows with the right brain. This does not alter the thrust of this report which uses the typical brain as a model. Note that a split brain patient with an atypical brain that shares functions, may draw say a three dimensional house but with one and a bit window rather than the three windows in this example; the left brain may draw something that hints at three dimensions).




At the front of the brain is an area known as the anterior cingulate cortex. This area “lights up” on scans when the brain does something of its own volition – the area associated with the “self” or “I”. In Alzheimer’s, most of the frontal brain is damaged and so is this area. Without this area working correctly, no person can be said to know what they are doing. Either they do out of habit, that is procedural memory learnt in childhood and early adult years, or they do something because someone else becomes their “will”.







An insane state of mind is said to exist, as defined herein, when the left and right brain loose coordination. This can be observed but often what we observe we fail to appreciate correctly.

There is an important distinction between an insane state of mind and a “diffuse” state of mind. The latter tends to form from those brain areas not useful to its purpose. A used car salesman does not want to stress the defects of a car and those brain areas which know about such are avoided when the state of mind forms. A judge or similar may avoid issues that may suggest violations of other laws and may desire to focus only on the matter at hand.

In studies of split-brain patients behavioural anomalies can be observed. A split brain patient may put on a shirt, button it, but as the left hand buttons, the other hand unbuttons. An “insane” action, a bizarre action, which we fail to observe for what it is. However, this insane action is not missed by the mind – one split-brain patient while making soup was unable to stop her left hand adding more salt. She solved the problem by tying her left hand to her apron.

Notice a contradiction? An observer might observe this act of tying a hand to an apron as a mark of insanity. In fact it is the opposite. Tying the hand is a mark of sanity. In some situations, if we fail to understand the state of mind, we may reach an incorrect conclusion.  While a state of mind can form that is insane by our definition, the rest of the brain and “will” may attempt to find a way around this state of mind. Action(s) on their own may not demonstrate insanity by our definition – an action(s) in the context of the situation has to be understood. The act of tying one hand to the apron is a sane action that attempts to control an insane state of mind.

Note that certain neurotransmitters need to be present in sufficient quantities, for example dopamine, for the “will” to work correctly. The discussion above assumes a brain with no hormonal or chemical deficiency.


Hypothesis

One way in which a magistrate or judge (or similar) may attempt to control an insane state of mind is by citing precedents. The more citations, the more likely an insane state of mind has formed – or, the more citations, the stronger your index of suspicion should be that the brain is atypical. One or two citations may be the norm when the brain is in an insane state of mind, any more may suggest an atypical brain.

The areas of law and religion are areas in which the citation of precedents or references can be an indicator of an insane state of mind. In other areas, be such science or engineering or medicine, citation of references is usually to indicate a particular research has been done already and it is credible. In religion and law, this can be far from truth, and citations to precedents or earlier teachings may be a “cover” to explain that which the brain fails to come to grips with.

Our definition of insanity applies specifically to those into law, hence we can use the expression insanity-in-law. It means loss of coordination between the left and right brain thus distortion of perspective resulting in irrational decisions presented as valid and legitimate and correct.

Hypothesis

Any legal decision that does not stand up to common sense, is likely an insane or twisted or corrupt decision, or one gratifying the “id” of the decision maker(s). When politicians market themselves to be elected by explaining a law or laws they will put into place, they are appealing to common and natural sense in people, not to “legal deliberations”. Thus common sense or natural sense must always be evident in a “sane” legal decision.



Psycholegalanalysis

The founder of modern chemistry is F.A.Kekule. No matter how hard he tried to work it out using his reason, he could not – then one day while drowsy on a local bus into his mind’s eye the unconscious projected images of chains of molecules and how such bond. Modern chemistry was born! The point being, the human unconscious is a far superior intelligence to conscious human reason and thoughts. No amount of consideration and deliberation can surpass the power of the unconscious to analyse and reason in its own way. The information in this report is also produced by a new medical science titled psycholegalanalysis – that medical science has to do with the unconscious.


Psychoanalysis is a science of the mind practised by most psychiatrists. It is an “offensive” science to the outsider, so much so it was at first banned by the American Medical Association. Now it is the cornerstone of understanding the mind. The reason it is offensive is because it deals with basic animal urges which the human brain harbors. Not urges people who are not psychiatrists wants to know about or even consider they may have in the unconscious. Zygmund Freud, the founder of the science, clearly told his students this medical science is not a subject for a dinner table discussion. It is a science absolutely offensive to non medical experts because it deals with matters we don’t wish to know about.


Psycholegalanalysis is a proposed new medical science pioneered by 5GL Software. It is the science of psychoanalysis, however, all known unconscious input used by lawyers is removed from consideration.

The conclusions of this science are medical diagnosis because only the medical diagnosis areas in the frontal lobes are used during this analysis. But note any conclusion is only valid until information comes along that mandates or warrants changing the conclusion.

The conclusions are not easily interpreted using plain sense. In most cases so far, the conclusion was reached well before it was clear why such a conclusion was reached.

There is a Clinical Manual for psychiatrists, the CMPL, which explains the conclusions of this science. The manual can be downloaded from relevant 5GL Software web pages.

The conclusions can only be interpreted by psychiatrists (or equivalent) familiar with the science of psycholegalanalysis and how the conclusions come about. Usually they can not be taken literally and normal natural understanding can not, in the beginning, be used to understand such a conclusion. In all cases thus far, only much later did facts emerge that put a conclusion into a rational framework.

The Legal Services Commissioner of NSW (the “police” of law firms) has been made aware of the first and second formal conclusion as explained below.

 
First Formal Conclusion

The first formal conclusion was made against the law firm (name). The conclusion was “incompetence”. (name) of (name) was formally informed of this via registered mail in about November 2009.

Only in April 2010 did it become clear what this conclusion could mean. It would seem (name) had failed to appreciate the information given to him, had assumed the law firm (name) representing another sibling would act ethically and properly, and waited for this – in fact, (name) had not advised (name) that they have a Will which they will use to apply for probate until after the process had completed.

Clearly, (name) should have immediately applied for a Cavet which blocks probate until the matter of a Will is resolved by the Supreme Court.

Thus the conclusion was correct and justified – incompetence. (name) failed to take proper action to block a legal process based on a Will that had no legal status and which was obtained under highly dubious circumstances.


Second formal conclusion

This was made against the law firm (name). The conclusion was awesome and impossible to understand. The conclusion, as documented in the CMPL and as explained to the Legal Services Commissioner, was:

(name) (the law firm) had refused to have anything to do with the matter because it is well known to experienced legal firms that magistrates in NSW sell court orders known as AVOs to solicitors and legal firms. The going price is $10,000. These can be used so a client can obtain a female child as s sexual slave, she named “protected” on the court order; or can be used to isolate the sole heir and sole executor of the Last Will and Testament of an elderly parent especially with Alzheimer’s, and engineer a Power of Attorney and new Last Will and Testament. On such AVOs, the parent is named as “protected” and no reason given and no just cause apparent. Most (or All or Major) legal firms in NSW are “house trained” to make sure they do not bring into the open the legal scams that AVOs make possible, hence the reason for the refusal of (name).

This conclusion was impossible to understand properly until April 27th, 2010, when I walked in the Supreme Court of NSW, into a room in which about 70 succession lawyers were waiting. The conclusion hit me like a brick! Mass corruption in matters of inheritance!

Note that as explained in the CMPL, the “$10,000” does not mean a magistrate was paid that money. While it could mean that in some cases, however, it refers to the amount of money the person who instigated the Alzheimer’s Scam (refer Alzheimer’s Scam Report) wanted in legal costs for an AVO. This amount was so extraordinary that psycholegalanalysis failed to find an alternate explanation other than the one stated. It is stressed in the CMPL that the conclusions need careful analysis, and such can not be taken literally and no assumptions are warranted as to what the conclusion implies.

Thus the conclusion was correct and justified.


Other Relevant Conclusions

(a)    The state of mind of objectivity, that is the state of mind in magistrates and judges or similar, is formed from delusions, fixations, and ideas of reference. It is an insane state of mind, however, it is usually of no clinical significance because it simply compels areas of the brain to use natural skills – the danger is that if this state of mind is manipulated and twisted, it will seek borders in the brain’s association areas and use these as “rationality”. Thus nonsense can become a legal fact and acquire legal status. The prime example is the acceptance by Supreme Court of NSW of “testament capacity” as a valid reason to accept a Will signed by a person with devastating injury to the frontal lobes. Absolute madness!

(b)    The corruption of the inheritance laws has to do with primeval instincts and urges. The animal brain strives to dominate and control others. The religion of law has become the most common means of satisfying this primeval instinct. To truly understand this, the brain has to be examined in fine detail using modern neuroscience. Courts of law have at their disposal an army of men and women. The enforcers of the law. Essentially mindless with an extremely low natural intelligence. To enforce anything is a “will”. Because of this, those into courts of law believe a “Will” is a sacred entity and they are masters of understanding what a “Will” is. This notion is imprinted on the psyche and in their “will”. No amount of rational argument may be able to “deblock” a “fragmented” association area in the brain that holds this view as a “will”.

Psycholegalanalysis clearly indicates magistrates and/or judges and/or tribunal members who sign court orders known as AVOs, or fail to counteract such already in place, attain an incredible unconscious sexual thrill under the following circumstances:-

a)    when there is no rational evidence and a sibling is isolated from a natural parent under the pretext the parent needs “protection”, when in fact that parent is put in a dangerous relationship with a sibling who is after the parent’s bank account and is on the path of engineering a new Last Will and Testament. The unconscious of the magistrate or judge(s) signing such a court order gets an extreme “sexual thrill” from being “god” and “master of evil” at the same time.

b)    when there is no rational evidence and a young female is “protected” from a natural father or next of kin. The unconscious knows these females will be sexually abused and the gratification of the unconscious sexual thrill in the magistrate or judge or official is extreme.


 
Review Questions


True or False

Neuroscience in Psychiatry is about understanding the state of mind of a particular subset of people.

Psycholegalanalysis is the process of psychoanalysis performed by the medical diagnosis areas in the brain.

Neuroscience in Psychiatry attempts to gather the unconscious clues that people belonging to a cultural subgroup give out, and then produce a conclusion from these.

Psycholegalanalysis has found to be correct in a great many true to life situations.

Psycholegalanalysis is not about diagnosing mental illness, even though on rare occasions this may turn out the case, but about putting into a clinical framework reasons for certain actions of police, lawyers, magistrates, judges, or similar. The result are conclusions or assertions.

Conclusions of psycholegalanalysis are a true medical diagnosis because these are derived at by the medical diagnosis association areas in the brain.


Agree or Disagree

The word “capacity” refers to volume but is also used in an ambigous way. A sentence such as “our factory does not have the capacity to meet this order” is ambiguous in that the overall meaning is understood but why exactly there is lack of capacity is not understood. There could be ever so many reasons why this is the case, from the manager being absent to lack of skilled draftsmen or similar, to the size of the actual factory, and so on. Hence, this word when used carefully by those intending to manipulate a judge or jury, has the potential to form a state of mind in the audience that can blind to the fact that there is no evidence. [cryptic clue or hint: modern neuroscience appreciates that, for example, information about what an apple is, is also heavily encoded in the olfactory areas of the brain, knowing this it may not be too difficult to shift the state of mind of a person examining an apple to form from the natural borders of the association areas and thus accept a rotten apple as still all right]


Reflect or Wonder

Think about your next door neighbour or someone you know. Think of events that may have taken place, most likely unintentional, that you could use together to demonstrate to a judge or jury a “pattern of behaviour” that constitutes “malice”. (hint: all you need to do is to form the required state of mind in a jury and the jury will be compelled to convict even when there is actually no evidence.)

A volunteer worker in a Saint Vincent de Paul workplace has asked a Roman Catholic Sister to marry him. He thought this was amusing. The Church took a different view and brought charges of sexual harassment against that person. What situations can you invent to persuade a jury in such a way that they would believe, that this was a case of sexual harassment?

Imagine yourself as a psychiatrist asked to explain to a jury a matter. However, you are being paid to in fact form a state of mind in the jury that the person paying top money to a legal firm wants. How might you begin? What about something like. "Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury. A famous psychiatrist, Lachlan, developed strong concepts that can explain this matter. One such concept he named as In-The-Name-Of-The-Father. Let me explain how this relates to the matter at hand....")