Drugs
database included. Quick and easy access
to adverse reactions or other information.
Any new drug can be added to the database.
|
Alzheimer’s Scam Report - $US49.95
A must read for anyone with Alzheimer’s in the family,
for medical doctors and lawyers. This report while reflecting an Australian
situation is likely to have implications in all countries. It shows how
relatively easy it is to stage an “assault”, then obtain a protection court
order naming an elderly demented parent as “protected”, a court order that
also gives the applicant sole control of the elderly’s bank account, and
then to engineer a new Last Will and Testament leaving all the estate to
the applicant. The death certificate is obtained and this Will passed through
a process known as probate and this is granted before other legal firms
acting for other members of the family are even aware this had taken place.
All too easy – if you know how!
However, the basic principles expounded could be used for all
manner of fraud under the disguise of a protection court order, even
to obtain a female child for sexual abuse. (in Australia, no reasons stated
on these when obtained from local courts!) Family members with shortage
of money or with an intellectual deficit or a mental illness (e.g. schizophrenia)
may be easy marks for scammers of this type. Staged “assaults” (in Australia
all you need to claim is that you were pushed and pay $10,000 to a legal
firm to obtain a protection court order naming not just you, but other members
of the family as “protected”) are easy to obtain. Lawyers refer to this
protection legislation as "Draconian" – however, it is not the law itself,
it is how the courts had “diluted” the law by legal precedents that had
made this possible. What the law actually is, and how the courts make decisions,
are not always the same thing.
The full report can be obtained from us at a cost of $US49.95.
It is a Microsoft Word document. You can purchase using PayPal by sending
this amount of money to our email account (med5gl@pacific.net.au). Once
your order is received, we will email instructions where to download
the full report from. The full report explains the “critical points”
to be aware of. For example, a sibling on the way to engineer a new Last
Will and Testament has to remove other siblings from the picture in the
legal sense – thus he or she may wait to stage an “assault” when another
sibling arrives who may have been entrusted by a dementia parent to pay
for insurance policies (e.g. for house and content) . The sibling intent
on Will fraud needs to have these in his or her hands and once a court
order is obtained, he or she can use it to ensure the policies are now
sent to him (or her). Thus there are “critical junctions” in a any legal
fraud that must be well coordinated.
The full report also contains an expert witness document prepared
for the World Health Organisation (WHO) and also submitted in court
case number 2010/83570 in the Supreme Court of NSW (Australia), a claim
under the so called “family provisions”. It is essential WHO is made
aware of such scams because a form of shock sets in some family members
who may even choose to separate from their spouses because they can not
cope with this “insanity of law”. It is also a question of forming solid
diagnosis criteria for Alzheimer's and a recommendiation to WHO is to
encourage medical associations to work with governments to ensure
basic basic legal work is completed prior to diagnosis. In the early stages,
the stress on other family members is not as extreme and most problems
can be sorted out and basic legal work ensured, perhaps by putting such
under the protection of a public guardian. The Alzheimer's Scam Report
should persuade WHO how very important it is to come to grips with the
Alzheimer's Scam but also the deficiencies in legal systems which make
all this all too easy - deficiencies which the correct process prior to
formal diagnosis may go a long way to overcome. However, this possibly
worldwide trend of staging "assaults" or "incidents" may in fact be outside
the scope of police or courts of law to come to grips with, and may require
a new type of medical specialist capable of "detective" like work.
Consider. Hide the medication a woman with schizophrenia needs, then scratch
yourself and call police claiming you were assaulted. Some schizophrenics
without medication may not even know who the man is or that he lives with
her in the same apartment and that they have two young attractive female
children. Hence to the police and courts, the person claiming assault will
come across as so genuine and the schizophrenia woman as a nut case. (this
incident observed in a show called COPS which films USA police on some of
their duties, and I came across this, and the poor woman did not have any
idea of what was going on and was desperate to have her medication which
she did not know where such were. All too easy if you know how?)
Another worrying aspect is what comes across as incompetence of government
agencies to come to grips with dementia or greed! In Australia (NSW) a
body known as the Guardianship Tribunal is supposed to step in and assign
a power of attorney and even a public guardian in cases of a dementia person
no longer being able to look after their own financial affairs. As demonstrated
in the expert witness document, this body in Australia compares a person
with Alzheimer's to a person with "two legs" and on this basis makes a determination
if such a person has the "capacity" to understand what they are signing!
Thus a sibling intent on Will Fraud simply gets a parent to sign power of
attorney - even years after the person has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's!
How those into law have learnt to think and reason, may be far removed from
any notions of rationality, sanity, and solid medical and common sense. All
these issues raised and demonstrated, ought to make WHO aware of the urgent
need to step in and form special medical procedures prior to diagnosis of
dementia and in some cases "assault". In fact, the Legal Services Commissioner
in NSW (police of law firms) has also been demonstrated that in cases of
such blatant Will Fraud, no legal firm could be found to represent sibling(s)
left out of a Will obtained by deception and/or fraud. Money sent to legal
firms was returned! Fraud that is so blatant may be too difficult for ordinary
lawyers to know how to present in higher courts. What do you actually present
when something is so blatant? Another problem is that scams to do with a Last
Will and Testament obtain a report from a geriatric specialist - in the case
of Ms White of this report, this specialist does not appear to know what
the MMSE is, putting a score in one report out of 20 and in another out of
29 (What does this have to do with anything anyway? By definition a person
with Alzheimer's has "clouded judgment"), also clamiming that Ms White's
blood pressure was 120/80 and she was not incontinent in one report (but
in a subsequent one explains the incontinence). Now, Ms J White, 80 year
old at the time, usually bedridden, had enormous difficulty getting out of
a chair let alone walk with a frame (she was on a disability pension). For
her, this was a super effort to walk into a public hospital - and her blood
pressure is 120/80! Note that in 5GL-Doctor which contains cases studies,
those involving over 75 year olds rarely have a BP perhaps because this
is not such a good indicator in the elderly that something is wrong, but
in those that do, the BP is nowhere near 80! The 120/80 is the standard typical
young adult measure. In the elderly, of course, the BP can vary with seasons,
the arteries also no longer that competent, and postural hypotension can
also set in when sitting. To see 120/80 is almost amusing. Was she on medication
to lower blood pressure? If she was, which could explain this BP, then
this is not mentioned perhaps because such medications further clouds the
mind and in medical reports that aid legal scams what is important is to
make a person come across as normal as possible. (But why would a geriatric
specialist in a public hospital cooperate with the Guardianship Tribunal
to make a person who was almost totally incoherent come across as almost
normal? Perhaps the answer is that public hospitals do not try to "stir
the pot" when formally requested by a judicial body to produce a particular
report? There is no rational explanation for the medical reports attached
to the expert witness documents. They are "puzzling" to say the least. They
are from one specialist in a public hospital, a director of the geriatric
unit in fact. Why a director? No suggestion this is a psych geriatric either.
However, these type of scams may need to be understood in perspective
in light of the mentality and state of mind of the culture that operates
the legal system. For example. While Australians of Anglo-Saxon background
are less than 50% since 2000, all the surnames of magistrates and judges
are typically Anglo-Saxon names (compare to sports team in which it can be
hard to find an Anglo-Saxon surname). This culture forms "views". This culture
is a monarchy oriented culture and the legal system the "protector" of the
weathy and those in the "upper class". (Compare to caste system in India;
the Anglo-Saxon mentality while different is very similar). Lawyers are considered
"offcers of court". In the case of Ms J White, the person who engineered a
legal scam is a lawyer, a Mr R White. In the expert witness document it is
explained that when Mr R White appeared in the witness box, he told one lie
after another inventing an elaborate tale of how he was assaulted and why.
The magistrate said "I am not satisfied" (a magistrate can not say to a lawyer
"you are lying") but had to approve this protection court order because Mr
R White is a lawyer and hence an "officer of the court" and the mentality
of the Anglo-Saxon is such that "officers of the court" are the upper echoleon
of "authority" and "credibility". Armed with a protection court order, Mr
R White can spread any malice he likes about Mr A white (the true executor
of a legal Will) shoving the court order in front of a person to establish
his credibility about what he is saying. It is possible this is the reason
the geriatric specialist felt obliged to write a report which included the
words "testament capacity" - this for a woman with Alzheimer's who hardly
managed to know where she was or who she was! Mr R White would have carefully
prepared reasons, some vile perhaps, that would persuade this medical doctor
to write a report in his favour explaining that Ms J White still has "testament
capacity" and hence the power of attorney and the new Last Will and Testament
she signed in 2005 was "legal"!
The question that begs to be asked - but why was Ms J White named as protected?
No lawyer approached and asked about this has been able to provide
an explanation!
|
