psychiatrists, clinical manual of psycholegalanalysis, Freud, psychonalysis, law and psychiatry
Alzheimer's Scam Report and the Young Female Sexual Abuse Scam
Final Version, June 2010
Main page is 5GL-Doctor Medical Diagnosis Expert System(s) which also contain a worldwide medical alert in this regard.

This report is also about explaining some clinical aspects of why this takes place.

(c) 5GL Software, Australia, 370 Jettys by the Lake, Windang, NSW, 2528, Australia
 emails  med5gl@pacific.net.au; mobile (Australia) 0432 655 218

There is also a professional version of this report but that is not free.

Content

1.0 In Brief
1.1 What is it exactly
1.3 Who is the likely victim
1.4 What makes it possible
1.5 Government attempts to counter this
1.6 Action (by us) to expose this scam
1.7 Our New Catholic Saint (why should the medical community be burdened with fighting this alone? Why not blackmail (in a "holy way" of course) the huge Roman Catholic Church to assist in this struggle for justice)
1.8 Brief Summary of Events in Focus


1.1 In Brief

This legal scam could be taking place in all countries and not just Australia. An expert witness report has been prepared for the World Health Organization (WHO) to encourage WHO to define the management of any neurological brain deficit to include legal considerations in regards to Last Will and Testament and power of attorney. That document was also submitted to the NSW Supreme Court in case number 2010/83570. The claim is about "enforcement of my mother's Will when of sound mind." All documents, including letters to the said court and other forums, are available from us (for a fee).


1.2 What is it exactly

The engineering of a last Will and Testament for a person with Alzheimer's or other mental deficit. While there could be some variations, the process is something like this:-

a) one sibling pretends to be assaulted, calls police, who find nothing. The sibling rushes to a specialist legal firm and pays $10,000 to obtain a court order known as AVO which names the elderly parent as "protected" (from the sibling who is the executor of an existing legal Will). No reason given on the court order. In Australia, it is not only the police who can apply for these "protection" court orders, but also legal firms and they don't need evidence - they invent it. Such a court order also gives that sibling sole access to the demented person's bank account. (sure, this is likely against Australian banking laws).

b) the mentally deficient person is then taken to a free public hospital geriatric specialist who produces a report stating the person has "testament capacity".

c) the person is then dragged to a legal office and a new Last Will and Testament and power of attorney is organized. That Will makes sure the sibling who paid for this, is the sole heir and executor. This is required to obtain the death certificate because the moment the elderly dies, this fraud Will is passed through a legal process known as probate for which the death certificate is required. In experienced hands, probate may be granted before any other sibling even knows this has taken place.

If you think this is a rare event - think again! On three  occasions I have been to the Supreme Court in regards to inheritance matters, a room full of siblings left out of a Will! Will fraud may be taking place on a daily basis.

Personal View Section

The aim of Anglo-Sxon courts in Australia is to generate huge revenue for those who address courts as "your honour" and "may it please the court". Stealing property by isolating an executor of a Will of a demented parent, then organizing a new Will, is likely an enshrined Anglo-Saxon tradition. As one court worked confided to me "typically from a property worth $500,000, the legal firms pick up $200,000 each and sometimes the parties in dispute even have to pay legal costs."

According to the document (link from our medical pages) titled Science of Law, the term "justice" to Anglo-Saxon courts means to ensure lawyers representing clients get as mouch money as a possible out of any property dispute. These people know how to steal using the courts because that shit is protected by that mindles primate called the police force.

Anglo-Saxon courts in Australia are absolute shit and every lawyer knows how to engineer a Will, how to obtain protection courts orders, and how to make for themselves a small fortune out of this. The Australian Constitution clearly states that any government acquisition of land must be on just terms. Probate is such a process. Just terms? No meaning to Anglo-Sason courts and unless you are a millionaire who can take a matter to the High Court, the concept of "just terms" has no meaning in Supreme Courts. The notion of "natural justice" and "truth" also has no meaning - in the court case mentionrd on our medical web page, and this in on record, a judge of the Supreme court considered these "laws" (as set by the High Court decisions) as "ideals" not laws. It is not just the Supreme Court. Institutions such as the Guardianship Tribunal and the Legal Services Commissioner have proved to be absolute Anglo-Saxon shit that gets paid lots of money and avoids making any real decisions. Legal property theft is part of an Anglican mentality since the origin of that religion and this is not going to change unless all Anglo-Saxons are removed from politics and courts. Since 2000, according to ABS figures, Australians of Anglo-Saxon origin are now a minority - but not in law and courts and police. Ultimately, the Anglo-Saxon in Australia may come to a bloody end because that legal-police system is utter shit which is about stealing wealth by engineering Wills and provision of female sexual "slaves" to those paying top money to legal firms who then isolate the guardian with a court order known as AVO - threatening decent human beings with that mindless Anglo-Saxon shit court police and their prisons. Just bear in mind that in the 1940's vicious rape and horror assaults of orphans became the norm in Anglo-Saxon orphanages in Australia. That is a matter of history. It is shit of a culture and that is the reason the courts in Australia relfect that shit mindest and are about control and domination and stealing wealth "legally" through any manner of legal scams. You need to remember these idiots believe and are convinced they are part of an Anglo-Saxon empire and they are infallible. This is much how Anglo-Saxon law is taught. Their police forces and their SWAT teams are primary there to ensure orders of courts, no matter how illegal or how blatantly corrupt or unethical, are shoved down people throats at a point of a gun if need be. The Cronulla riots some time back came ever so close to wiping out the Anglo-Saxon out of the country once and for all. The next Cronnulla+ riots may see an end to the Anglo-Saxon mentality and a major change in the country's political and legal system.



1.3 Who is the likely victim?

Properties in many countries are sometimes worth millions of dollars. All it takes is a sibling who is a psychopath or has such tendencies, or who does not get along with other siblings, or possibly even a near relative, or one on drugs or in debt, to engineer a Power of Attorney and new Last Will and Testament for a person with  Alzheimer's (perhaps any dementia and/or serious brain infarctions and/or lesions to frontal lobes). That Will makes that sibling executor and sole heir. The sibling is likely to be talked into this by a legal firm. [note: the area in the brain known as the anterior cingulate cortex is probably critical to a Will, any damage in this area and a person may sign anything; any atrophy of the hippocampus and a person may sign anything].

On the other end of the scale, some properties are not worth much, less than the costs of an expensive court action, and thus driven by greed or drugs or debts, any sibling may be talked into engineering Will fraud by a specialist legal firm. A typical scenario may go like this: a sibling who is a drug addict talks to a legal firm saying he or she has lived that long with his parent(s) and deserves more than is in the Will. The legal firm jumps on this!

In regards to female child sexual abuse, such a child protected by a court order known as AVO, the most likely scenario is a separated or divorced or single mother with a pretty female child (I would suggest 7 to 12 year olds most vulnerable, not sure how I formed this opinion) who suddenly has a new man in her life who persuades her to "protect" the child from her natural father (or a relative on the father's side).


1.4 What makes it possible

a) the corruption of legislation by the Supreme Court of NSW (likely takes place in all States). The inheritance laws are destroyed by decisions that allow a Will to be accepted if the person can be shown to have had "testament capacity". The NSW government had tried more than once to design these laws so this type of scam can not take place. The Supreme Court always appears to find a way around the legislation. Law in Australia is huge business - enormous business. Courts appear there to serve the legal occupational group and their decisions become precedents which open more and more paths how to bypass any legislation the government puts into place. The other sets of laws largely destroyed are the "protection" laws commonly known as AVOs. Anyone can obtain such, for lots of money, through legal firms, all a person needs to claim is that they were pushed or insulted even. It is that pathetic and idiotic. No evidence is required in a court. As long as a person pays top money to a legal firm, it appears they will invent evidence.

What does "corruption of legislation" mean? It simply means making decisions not intended by legislation. Example. Say your friend asks you to look after his property while he is away on holidays. He gives you the keys to his house. Instead of doing this, you decide that your friend meant is "you can move into my house" and you move in and throw parties and the like. Hence you "corrupted" what you were asked to look after, this to suit your own personal or business interests.

b) the protection, as it appears, by some police cells of courts that clearly sell such court orders almost openly. Thus these people will arrest siblings who for example visit a dying parent in a nursing home - this even if the AVO has expired! The case number mentioned above contains an example of that situation. Normally, an AVO is applied for by the police and costs nothings. When applied by a legal firm, without exception its purpose is a "scam" of some sort.

c) the "dinosaur nature" of the Supreme Court(s) of the country. No duty of care appears to be taken in processing a Will obtained by deception and/or fraud through probate. This court expects the "executor" of a Will to advertise in newspapers. In the age of Internet it is questionable how many people would bother reading the small print at the back of the paper! Even if the true executor or other siblings engage a legal firm, chances are by the time this firm obtains all the facts, the fraud Will would have been passed through probate.

d) the nature of the principles of law. A case may open in which a person with a tiny amount of brain damage had signed a new Will. The damage so minor the court decides this Will is legal on the grounds the person had "testament capacity". However, this opens a way for any law firm to begin engineering Wills on the grounds of "testament capacity". In courts of law, lawyers quote references to past cases as if these said it all - the circumstances leading to a decision are not usually explained fully. Hence, one decision such as this one, can mean a path is opened for massive Will fraud. Geriatric hospital specialists may be explained something like "testament capacity just means he or she still recalls her children". The naive physician accepts this and writes down "so and so has testament capacity".

e) the irrelevant nature of many legal "comparisons". In the expert witness report prepared for WHO, there is an attachment from a body known as the Guardianship Tribunal. This body accepts that an Alzheimer's victim can still have testament capacity and to justify this they compare Alzheimer's to a person with two legs! An idiotic and abstract comparison meaningless in medical science, but says it all to courts of law!

f) what medical people fail to appreciate is that lawyers and courts of law are not scientists and do not think like scientists. Lawyers have their skills, certainly, but they also fail to have skills in areas outside the scope of their experience, and this results in rubbish comparisons being used to explain a matter. To back such comparisons up, they tend to produce reports from "expert witnesses". Thus if a geriatric hospital specialist says a person has "testament capacity", this is the end of the matter, these people don't understand medicine or that a geriatric specialist is hardly qualified to address non-basic issues to do with the mind and brain. In a proper court of law, under cross-examination, such a specialist could easily admit he or she does not really know what he or she is talking about - but that requires experts in cross-examining an expert witness and these are expensive and in any case the aim of "Will fraud" is to make sure the case never goes to a hearing and "mediation" resolves the matter. Thus Will fraud, the way specialist legal firm see it, is a no loss situation - the matter will never come to court because a settlement will be made out of court, but having been granted probate and claiming to be executor gives the law firm super advantage in negotiations. Consequently, some victims of Will fraud may end up with a payout that is less than legal costs! These experts know how to make money. They charge anywhere between $400-$2000 an hour to prepare "affidavits", and then may hire all manner of experts such as forensic accountants to evaluate the estate and wealth - the costs of such exercises sky rocket! The true winners from Will fraud are specialist legal firms and, providing a hearing does not take place that exposes the fraud, the person who pays top dollars to a legal firm to engineer Will fraud.

g) law is not what people think it is. Non trivial laws are argued in courts of law using a form of intellectualism specific to lawyers and courts of law. It is not science, it is not logic, it is a set of principles which too often can be manipulated to suit any argument. As most legal books point out "law is about winning" - not truth, justice, fairness, anything of this nature, only about "winning".

h) civil law in perhaps any country is very much about protecting the rich from the poor, not about justice - that is sold to naive people. The human being is not that far removed from an animal in the sense of base instincts. Greed is paramount in almost everyone and most people will take the opportunity when such presents itself. Divorce cases are one example in which one couple suddenly begins manipulation to obtain as much financial advantage as possible. In any situation, a family member or close friend can turn against the other siblings to satisfy greed which is as much an addiction as smoking or gambling. People always desire more and more money. Courts of law are a perfect way for someone to obtain wealth they may not be entitled to, but if a "scam" or "legal fraud" method is in place, there is a good chance a person motivated by money will take such an option.

No medical person ought to fool themselves about experts in crime known as specialist legal firms. These people may arrange all manner of intimidation against family members - such as subpoening fincial records; such as spreading rumours among guilable family members why an AVO was given, some of such rumours could be offensive in the extreme. The general police with their low level intelligence and seriously thinking all people are like the thugs they encounter, are also especially guilable to manipulation. Most of the aim of this is the fear that such fraud may be exposed in the highest courts so they do their best to ensure families become terrified of going to superior courts. Specialist legal firms can organize property theft by engineering a Will, or can arrange divorce settlement that bypasses the law altogether or can provide a female child for sexual abuse to those paying top dollars. Courts of law and poilice many be painted as "good guys" by television but that is only television  - in ordinary life as the case mentioned includes, these people invent arrest to protect courts of law blatanly corrupt. The police are so idiotic they want pictures of magistrates and judges being handed $10,000 in cash - else they have no evidence as far as they are concerned even when corruption is open and blatant and any semi-intelligent person on jury would easily convinct magistrates and judges. The narrow intellectualism lawyers specialise in also tends to constrict the mind to see the way they want something to be seen - thus "property theft" becomes a "legitimate legal process".

The other thing is that once an AVO is purchased for $10,000 or so, the person that purchased such may attempt to try and provoce family members who appear to violate this. When a parent is finally in a nursing home, this sibling may show this AVO to the director and say that if any other sibling comes to visit the parent, this sibling has to be called because this is illegal - and he or she shoves the court order before the director's face.  A father who may have wanted to protected his daughter may end up with a criminal record and in prison. The aim here is to cause as much intimidation as possible, to terrify siblings, so no former action takes place in the superior courts when the time comes.


1.5 Government attempts to counter the corruption of laws by the Supreme Courts (NSW the case study but this is likely in all States)

Successive NSW governments had tried to scrap and re-write laws to counter Will fraud. Politicians being what they are, such did not explain to the courts they need to change the laws to stop the courts corrupting these, they found other reasons to justify such changes. But all to no avail. So they came up with laws commonly known as "family provisions" under which any sibling left out of a Will can apply for "relief". The actual wording of these laws is such that they were clearly intended to uncover fraud in matters of inheritance - however, it does not appear the Supreme Court actually understands such complex laws. This is a clinical view and the reason explained below.

Those who are magistrates and judges in Australia think they are "objective". This is the state of mind they desire. Not a state of mind natural to people and the result is, as the new proposed medical science of psycholegalanalysis explains, a state of mind formed from delusions, fixations, and ideas of reference. Not clinically significant except such a state of mind can be manipulated by experts to accept irrational evidence as truth and facts. The inheritance laws are a prime example. All it takes is one expensive legal firm to win a case that involves a person with a minor intellectual disability who signed a Will. The resultant decision will accept that this person had "testament capacity". This is snapped up by legal firms who then expand this notion to anything! In so doing, decisions such as this corrupt the intent of legislation. The other way the Supreme Court(s) corrupt the law is by inventing rules and procedures some of which are contrary to the Constitution. For example, under the Constitution only the police are empowered to enforce the law, and serving legal documents is enforcing the law - but this is not good enough for the courts, they want people to serve these themselves in so called "civil matters".

Further, under the Australian Constitution, which is in itself an act of British parliament, when a government acquires any land it must be on "just terms". The process of probate is exactly that, the government through the courts acquiring land and handing it to someone else - but the notion of "just terms" appears completely lost on the Supreme Court of NSW.

From my research, I am satisfied those who are judges or magistrates have limited capacity to understand non trivial laws. This is not what being "objective" is about. To actually understand non-trivial law implies a "bias" which these people strive not to have. Hence what the law is, that is left up to expensive legal firms to "persuade" the court about. If you walk into the Supreme Court and ask for a printout of the relevant legislation, the standard response is "we don't give legal advice."

The corruption of AVO laws also leads to a possibility of young female children being made "protected" so that a new boyfriend of a single mother could have a field day in the sexual sense with the child. During the presence of our web pages, I only had one call that alarmed me to this possibility - but considering the heavy medical nature of these pages and how difficult it is for anyone to find these nowadays especially non-medical people - that is still alarming! From memory, this young man was suddenly isolated from both his daughters by an AVO, both named protected, and he had no idea why. The reason his former partner gave did not make sense to him and he was concerned about both his daughters safety. One problem here is that in some cases a certain amount of violence may have taken place in the past and the reason a couple may have separated - but that sort of incident can be used as an excuse to isolate a man from his children at anytime in the future and it is hard and very expensive to try and fight one of these AVOs in courts.


1.6 Action taken to expose this scam to in particular medical people

The Alzheimer's Scam Report is of course that attempt. The Expert Witness document prepared for WHO is remarkable in that the person who went into the Alzheimer's Scam was a lawyer and a psychopath! As medical science knows, the brain activity in psychopaths is very different to normal brains and throughout his career this person would have identified every which way in which he can use the legal system as a personal weapon. Thus that report actually explains much to psychiatrists about the "weaknesses" of a legal system and that is likely to apply to all legal systems. A wealth of modern psychiatric insight had been provided by that particular situation and the resultant legal case and the expert witness document.

A somewhat unorthodox attempt was made too - namely, the Ms J White (not her real name) of this report, the victim of this scam now deceased, was declared a Saint of the Roman Catholic church. An expert witness document was then put together for the Cardinals of the church and so far it appears it has been accepted. Which means that the church has in its power to alert all people to this insidious and evil scam by simply declaring Ms J White a Saint. Nothing takes the public interest more than such a declaration and everyone wants to know all about the why and the how. The reason the Cardinal(s) had no real choice but to accept this declaration, was because the expert witness document was put together by a "mystical" group known as Life in the Spirit (telepathy in modern terms, a mystical experience, not a group run or managed by the church). This Life in the Spirit group had produced an expert witness report so "holy" that no theologian would fail to understand that the group that put it together does exist. The basis is simple: victims of the legal scam such as Alzheimer's are literally crucified by the legal system, which is what happened to Jesus of course, thus the process of crucifixion produces in the victims a tiny "holy spirit" which the church is obliged to look after. A simple but effective, and theologically sound, argument. But, even if this type of mystical reasoning goes above the head of some theologians, Ms J White's son also did volunteer work for Saint Vicent de Paul. Thus a person who had served God directly (in the theological sense and by current theological reasoning) has the "holy right" to declare a Saint. In fact, other "options" were included in that expert witness report so much so that it is unlikely that any theologian would know how to argue or dispute this sanctification. In addition, words to this effect were included "your Eminence(s). Is the church on the side of God or mammoth? You have an opportunity, because one incident to do with Ms J White and the largest bank in Australia, to bring down that bank! A complete collapse of the bank is likely to follow this declaration. Whose side are you on? Is the church concerned with the economy of one country or in empowering people with hope and faith? Declare our Saint, and the largest bank in the country may collapse in a matter of months - the world will want to understand why and will want to know all the details. The people will read into all this the Will of God and the power of love. Your Excellencies(s) - may the grace of Saint Paul be upon you and please think carefully. In your laps, the document you are reading, is a golden egg that only happens every few thousand years. Cease on it please. In regards to miracles that tradition burdens the Saints with, there are in fact options. For one - I don't understand how it was medically possible for my mother to have survived for that long with Alzheimer's! I know that as an expert in a medical field. For another, she died on November 11, at 11 am. A coincidence? Or a message of peace from the Holy Spirit? There are not that many people with faith but there are so many believers. The options are yours. In regards to potential collapse of a bank. Consider Jesus and the coin - to whom does the coin belong?"


1.7 The new Catholic Saint - Ms J White (not her real name)

During World War II, as a young girl in German occupied Poland, with her mother she hid a young Jewish girl under the bed when the Gestapo came around looking for Jews. A feat of incredible courage. In later years like many people on a war devastated European continent, she chose to emigrate to Australia in order to ensure a better life for her two sons. Fond of books, with perhaps her favourite book being The Count of Monte Christo. Highly intelligent but not knowing English she had to settle (like many migrants) for mundane factory work. Sometimes she also mended trousers of Australian soldiers. From memory, a particular disposal store in Sydney had some kind of contract and obtained these, and then hired migrant women interested in mending these. Her mother and brother had Alzheimer's and she began to experience the symptoms sometime around 1998, finally diagnosed in 2002. Interesting, from a medical point of view, the very first sign of Alzheimer's might have taken place long before 1998. When at a friend's spouse's funeral, she burst out laughing. Deeply upset about this, she sought medical advice and was  reassured this was a panic reaction and not to worry about it - and yet, in hindsight, maybe it was the first sign of Alzheimer's? Alzheimer's is a progressive, neurodegenerative disease characterized by memory loss, language deterioration, impaired visuospatial skills, poor judgment, indifferent attitude, but preserved motor function. It is caused by faster than normal loss of brain cells particularly in the front and side of the brain. It is found usually in the elderly but may begin as early as over 50. The brain damage causing dementia is the abnormal production of the protein 'amyloid'. Alzheimer's disease is the most common form of dementia in the elderly. What is truly rremarkableabout MMs.J White is that while cruelly separated from her first-born son by a vicious scam, she never forgot him or her grandchildren! Her soul to soul connection with her first-born was incredibly strong even when most of her ccognitivefunctions failed. That probably defies current medical explanation. One of the structures in the brain known as the hippocampus is critical to memory and in Alzheimer's it shrinks, resulting in memory loss at all levels and quite rapidly sometimes. Hence for a person with Alzheimer's not to see someone for 2 years and still recall who they are, is not easily explained if we follow through the effect of the disease on the brain and memory. Even when in the nursing home, she did not know where she was or why there were other people "in her room", but she somehow incredibly recognized her first born and her grandchildren! About a week before her death, at the Holy Family nursing home n Quaker's Hill, by this time she could hardly speak because her word areas were now devastated by Alzheimer's, when asked by a nurse who came in who her son with her was, and does she recognize him, she nodded and uttered one single word in Polish which in English literally translates to "my miracle." (but even here there is a mystery because the Polish word contains a "c" then a "u" - but that is a long association in the brain which devastated language areas are unlikely to be able to make - unless, because of the way it is pronounced, the brain actually knows it as a "short word" and the brain is known to store these differently. For example, count the f's in this sentence "the files of my former life are now of no use to my family". Most people would not count the "f" in the "of" because that is a short word and the brain does not "see" the "f" in that word as such, you have to focus with other parts of the brain to see the "f" in the word. Hence, for a neuroscientist (medical) such as myself, by analyzing the process of the disease, the whole nature of how my mother managed is beyond my explanation!)

Ms J White (not her real name; would you believe it is illegal to use her real name because she has appeared before a body known as the Guardianship Tribunal which is supposed to protect the elderly from scams like this - in practise it does not in my experience, it does nothing, it even refused to call witnesses that can confirm that she is being left alone for ever long periods and hence abused by the person who obtained the AVO - if she falls, she can't stand up by herself). In the image Ms J White is with her natural son Mr A White. Note that she is oblivious to where she is (in a nursing home), or that her house and bank account has been stolen from her and from the grandchildren she loved by what comes across as a well established and executed legal scam; she is happy to be with her natural first-born son - a soul to soul connection. That picture alone ought to convince anyone not familiar with legal scams about the truth of the matter. The human brain takes in visual input best of all and forms the most correct appreciation from such - and the reason it is said a picture paints a thousand words. Mr R White designed a new Last Will and Testament in 2005, this not understood until 2009, and in this Will not only does he inherit the lot, also he alone is responsible for the funeral! This "fraud" was carefully hidden until 2009 when a true and proper Will made was handed to a legal firm. Suddenly this new Will surfaced, supposedly signed by a woman diagnosed with moderate dementia for about 2 years prior! By the time the legal firm with the legal will obtained more information, the false Will had already been shifted through probate and probate granted! (message to all doctors: advise your patient to act quickly in such situations, white collar specialist criminals are fast and know all the angles).

Mr R White is a solicitor, a lawyer, in Australia. This is the man a jury could be convinced that, so I believe, paid up to $10,000 for an AVO in 2004 just to ensure his Alzheimer's parent could not be taken to medical specialists while he engineered a power of attorney and a new Last Will and Testament.


1.8 Brief Summary of Events in Focus

The names are not the real names (for legal reasohns of course as you can appreciate it would be risky to include the real names in this document). Mr R White is a solicitor (a lawyer).


2002 After much confusion by her family, Ms J White is formally diagnosed with dementia most likely Alzheimer's type. This diagnosis is made at a free public hospital after an operation for bowel cancer. By this time Ms J White has urinary incontinence and does not even know how to answer a telephone and she has such a poor memory and ability to understand that the family is seriously worrying what it is

2003 Mr A White applies to Centrelink to become her full time carer (i.e. to obtain a meagre "carer's allowance"). Ms J White began an unsual pattern of showering up to ten times a day and she had a disability due to an artificial hip and had to walk with a frame and her balance was poor, and Mr A White decided that either his mother lives with him and family or he becomes full time carer. Problem with Mr A White's house was that it was not modified to have bars that she could use to hold onto, so Mr A White decides he would have to move in with his mother and visit his own family on some weekends. The local physician signs the necessary forms stating in his opinion Ms J White needs a full time carer.

2004 Mr R White, who while officialy resides with his mother, is hardly ever there, becomes obnoxious at times, so much so it is as if he is looking for a provocation that may result in a physical violent reaction on Mr A White's part. Problemn here is Mr A White is not that sort of person and this is proving impossible for Mr R White. Some kind of delusion seems to be setting in in Mr R White. For example, Mr A White has a grown up daughter with her own car. At one time Mr R White begins insists that car was paid for by Ms J White and wants all the money back even threatening to "pulp your head with a brick if this money is not paid back". Under the circumstances, Mr A White informs Centrelink he will no longer live with his mother full time hence he is no longer eligible for carer's allowance. (Mr A White's daughter had her own part time job at a chemist for years and had saved up for the car on her own. Mr R White does not seem to believe this or want to).

October 2004 Mr A White arrives at his mother's to stay with her for an extended time. With him are two insurance policies. He has been looking after the insurance for the house and content for sometime. To pay these, he needs his mother's ATM card to take the money out. He can not find it, so he asks Mr R White who is at home. Mr R White refuses to hand it over. When asked again in the kitchen, Mr A White pointing out it is important to pay the insurance premiums, Mr R White slips (so it appears at the time). While Mr A White is with his mum talking in the lounge, suddenly police arrive. Apparently Mr R White had called the police claiming he was assaulted! At the time Mr A White, because of his mother's incontinence and the floor being slipper even when cleaned, presumes Mr R White slipped but felt he was pushed? Suddenly Mr R White claims he can not find his wallet and insists the police search Mr A White's car. Fortunately, on this occassion, Mr A White had locked his car - which he usually did not bother at his mother's place except at night.

November 2004 Police arrive on Mr A White's door step with a court order known as an AVO which names Ms J White as "protected". No reason stated. Two legal firms are asked to explain this. None can but point out the costs of hearings could be high. Official complaint to NSW police is made. A policeman about to retire is sent to investigate. Mr A White informs this policeman that the most likely reason for this has something to do with his mother's Will which names Mr A White as executor. Police unable to do anything though.

Extract from the Clinical Manual of Psycholegalanalysis (re Conclusion (Diagnosis) of Corrupt Conduct; second diagnosis criteria)

OR

a)    person claims to have been assaulted and calls police.  Police find no evidence of assault
b)    a protection court order arrives, not applied for by the police but by the person who claimed assault that police found no evidence for. Such a court order may “protect” others not just the person concerned

In this case the magistrate or judge who signed that court order is considered as having acted corruptly until a jury clears the said person


December 2004 Attorney General of Australia is formally informed, "don't theraten me with your shit called AVOs! Every lawyer in the country knows these are sold through legal firms and used as the basis of legal scams. You have thirty days to remove it and make an apology. Fail to do this, and the Commonwealth Bank, the biggest bank in Australia, will collapse in time. Australia will become a living flame. This is not a threat of any kind, it is a statement of truth". (All right, so Mr A White may have become carried away here because of anger - or had he? Think about the Saint angle?).

About March 2005. Suddenly Mrs A White, wife of Mr A White, is subpoened to produce all her financial records. No one understands why.

About June 2005. After 9 months delay, a hearing is finally in place to confirm or reject this AVO. Mr R White while a lawyer has paid a very expensive barrister to represent him. Mr A White is representing himself. In the wtiness box, Mr R White invents one lie after another but because he is a lawyer and thus an "officer of the court", apparently the magistrate while clearly saying "I am not satisfied" nevertheless appears to have no legal choice but to confirm this AVO.

About July 2008 Mr A White is arressted for visting his dying mother in a nursing home. The AVO had in fact expired. At the time Mr A White was working for the largest bank in Australia.

11 November 2008, at 11 am, Ms J White passes away.  At her funeral she is declared a Roman Catholic Saint by Mr A White. Two Catholic Sisters with a solemn vow are fully aware and witness. The priest falls asleep during the service (as is required by the Will of God). An expert witness document is prepared for Roman Catholic Cardinals explaining this sanctification was authorised by a Roman Catholic Life in the Spirit group (not a group run by the church, a "mystical" group, in modern terms such use telepathy to enter the state of the spirit and be with God for a time). Response from the Vatican is anticipated and in line with that expected. The fall of the largest bank in Australia is now only a matter of time.

January 2010 A legal firm handed Mr J White's Last Will and Testament by Mr A White, now informs Mr A White a new Will had been engineered by Mr R White naming him as sole heir and executor

April 2010 Formal claim under the family provisions act begins in the Supreme Court of NSW. An expert witness document prepared for WHO is the affidavit. It explains Mr R White has been diagnosed as a psychopath by 5GL-Doctor Medical Diagnosis Expert System (a diagnosis a psychiatrist would need to confirm) and his actions completely understandable.

June 2010 Second front preparation in place, claim against NSW Police. The purpose of this claim is to bring about public awareness.