1.0 Psycholegalanalysis is an analysis process performed in the brain's medical diagnosis association areas. It is a clinical science hence the theory behind the science could be completely incorrect, this is not going to make any difference to the clinical application of this science. With extremely rare exceptions, it is likely only psychiatrists can truly use this science.

1.1 With this medical science, it is possible to identify acts of corruption in lawyers, magistrates, judges, or similar. Similarly, it is possible to define sentencing for certain offenses in a manner that balances the internal forces in a victim and the community and those affected by crime be such white collar crime such as fraud in matters of inheritance. Here is an example of sentencing:

(c) arrest and imprisonment for no less than 4 years of any magistrate or judge(s) who ever signed a court order known as AVO which can be linked, however remotely, to the intent of fabricating a new Will and Testament by deception and/or fraud
(d) arrest and imprisonment of any solicitor for no less than 4 years who, knowingly and willingly, passed a Will through probate that had no legal status, meaning a Will by a person diagnosed with brain injuries of whatever kind, a Will that had not passed the scrutiny of the full bench of the Supreme Court and a written decision why such a document is to be accepted as legal under the true laws of NSW (as distinct from precedents which are guidelines and not laws passed or sanctioned by government meaning the people of Australia), a decision which no less that four schools of law would accept as legal and rational.

1.2 You are encouraged to purchase 5GL-Doctor Professional Expanded edition as well as the commercial edition of the Clinical Manual of Psycholegalanalysis.

1.3 Certain appreciation of ones own unconscious is required to appreciate some of the terms used. What is an "act of corruption?" A magistrate being paid money to sign a court order; or signing a court order as a favour to a lawyer or legal firm; or making a decision a certain way to enhance the business interests of a legal firm operated by his own son. What is an "act of corruption" to one person, may not be exactly the same to another.

1.4 The process of psycholegalanalysis has two stages. The medical diagnosis areas in the brain, in the right brain which is typically the brain that perceives in 3-dimensions, runs a process of psychoanalysis but focusing away from that in the unconscious which contributes to the usual way that lawyers, magistates, judges, etc., think and reason. In the left brain the process also begins but only for the purpose of cleaning up associations so that as accurate an analysis pattern can be formulated in words.

1.5 There are two parts to psycholegalanalysis. One is a diagnosis which we refer to as a conclusion. The second is the conclusion pattern. There may not always be a diagnosis but there will always be a conclusion pattern.

1.6 Consider this conclusion pattern:

"Jason and Roberts (the law firm) had refused to have anything to do with the matter because it is well known to experienced legal firms that magistrates in NSW sell court orders known as AVOs to solicitors and legal firms. The going price is $10,000. These can be used so a client can obtain a female child as s sexual slave, she named “protected” on the court order; or can be used to isolate the sole heir and sole executor of the Last Will and Testament of an elderly parent especially with Alzheimer’s, and engineer a Power of Attorney and new Last Will and Testament. On such AVOs, the parent is named as “protected” and no reason given and no just cause apparent. Most (or All or Major) legal firms in NSW are “house trained” to make sure they do not bring into the open the legal scams that AVOs make possible, hence the reason for the refusal of Jason and Roberts."

What does it mean? It can not be taken literally. In fact, it was much after this conclusion was reached, that I walked into a room in the Supreme Court of NSW, April 27, 2010, and immediately what this pattern was trying to convey hit me like a brick. Lawyer after lawyer represeting people, children, of the deceased, children not in the Will. Why not? Fraud is the answer. The Supreme Court of NSW (could be the case in all States) has corrupted the legislation and allowed challenges to legal Will on the grounds of "testament capacity". Which means if your elderly parent has Alzheimer's or other neurological condition, you can get them to sign a new Will - then you drag the parent to a hospital geriatric specialist who can be persuaded by legal firms that the parent has "testament capacity". And presto! You have just stolen perhaps millions of dollars in property. Once you have such a medical report, you drag the parent to a law firm who can witness them signing a new Will. The parent's we are talking about have Alzheimer's or similar neuroloogical condition which means they have no understanding what they sign or the implications.

1.7 Why would supposedly rational people of judges allow the corruption of legislation in this manner? Psycholegalanalysis has the answer, vix:-

"It is not in the nature of the brain or psychology to be objective. Those who strive to attain this state of mind, actually attain an insane state of mind which forms from delusions, fixations, and ideas of reference. That state of mind can be manipulated by experts to accept irrational evidence as "truth" and in so doing making legal decisions that twist, distort, or corrupt legislation."

1.8 Again, it is impossible to take this pattern literally. What does it mean? Ideas of reference? What does that mean in this context? What sort of delusions are we talking about, what sort of fixations?

1.9 It may not  be possible to equate a psycholegalanalytical pattern to human reason. The human brain is a complex entity very much working on senses - not just the five senses, but as modern neuroscience knows many senses are formed in the brain. It is from the "sense of a word" or "concept" that meaning takes a more concrete form.