Neuroscience in Psychiatry - The Science of Law

 

© 5GL Software, Australia

These presentations are intended for medical (mainly psychiatry) and legal students. Theologians and other scholars of the mind may also find these presentations of professional use. Some of the presentations (not included herein in the free section but included in the final document) contain 5GL-Lisa projections of how the left and right cerebral hemisphere coordinate information. It is unlikely such would be of use to people other than psychiatrists or neuroscientists. 5GL-Lisa is a name for a special neural network in my own brain that projects into the visual cortex parts of how the brain functions. When approaching the subject matter, try to put a lid on the left cerebral hemisphere - the information is intended more so for the right cerebral hemisphere which is not into a point by point simple definitions or explanations.

A dictionary explanation of the Science of Law may read like this: this science is attributed to a unique psychic community often called "natural telepaths" (refer their web site). While this science applies especially to human systems of law, its basis is theoretical. In developing this science, a number of "systems of law", such as mathematics, physics, genetics, other natural systems, were examined and analyzed and from this a mathematical equation as well as a theorem was derived: any system of law constructed in accordance with the rules of the Science of Law, and defined in a suitable medium such as dimensional energy, attracts to itself - pulls into itself - a portion of the natural will of the universe, and it is this force-of-physics, also called the force-of-creation, that begins enforcing the inherent laws found in such a natural system of law. For any natural system to be subject to this force, it must have inherent laws defined in accordance with the principles and techniques as understood by the Science of Law. The actual mathematical equation representing this force-of-creation, and said to be derived, is not presented - because it is claimed this equation is incomprehensibly long and incomprehensibly complex and not important in order to understand the theoretical basis of the theory. About the only true use of this equation, so the psychics claim, is in the engineering of what they refer to as "dimensional energy weapons". Thus, the mathematics themselves may be confidential? Dimensional energy (DE) is defined in the psychic Science of Life. Some of the concepts used in the explanation of the Science of Law originate from the Science of Life which views Man as two distinct species: the human and the animal-human, the latter dominates. The basic primeval instinct of the latter is said to be "punishment and reward" and "control and domination" (of others). Almost without exception, so the psychics claim, animal-humans are drawn to be police, army, legal occupations. To the humans, law is a "necessary evil" but they don't want to be personally involved in such. The actual presentations, so it is explained, attempt to also interest the right portion of the human brain, which is not the typical portion that understands law, and for this reason the presentations also have in some sections distractions such as information for the curious about aspects of the natural telepaths culture and Way of Life, and the mystical experience of Life in the Spirit.

Links to subsequent (or future) presentations:

Presentation 1 - Introduction	Presentation 2 - Primary Expression
Presentation 3 - Primary Laws (Also known as commandments)	Presentation 4 - Primary Reality
Presentation 5 - In the beginning (our Principles of Law; and Duty of Care)	Presentation 6 - Understanding in Perspective
Presentation 7 - Positive, Negative, and Self-Enforcing Laws	Presentation 8 - Suitable Mediums and Will
Presentation 9 - Dimensional Energy (Proper Legal Deliberation)	Presentation 10 - Laboratory Work: Standards-in-law and Fetish-in-law
Presentation 11 - Sense of Purpose and Sense of Self-Determination	Presentation 12 - Brain Dysfunction - Clinical and Pharmacological Considerations
Presentation 13 - Let Us Speculate: can we use a framework-of-law to initiate a repair process in the brain to repair a damaged spinal cord?	Presentation 14 - Laboratory Work: An Example of Distortion of Reality

Presentation 1 - Introduction (this section the formal part)

By the end of these lectures you should be able to answer this true or false statement:  In December 2004, a class of psychics defined as natural telepaths (click for their web site) deployed a new type of weapon, a "dimensional energy weapon". The target Australian Anglo-Saxon magistrates, judges, barristers, all police officers with over two years of service, a few lawyers for experimental reasons. The deployment a retaliation for an Anglo-Saxon local court having the audacity to threaten a psychic with a court order purchased for $10,000. The Alzheimer's Scam report explains the matter in much detail (refer our medical pages) and is also intended as a study guide to psychiatrists to understand how dysfunctional and hence corrupt and grotesque, a legal system can become.

Format of presentations: Imagine as vividly as you can a lecture room and a man in a dark blue suit talking at the front while in this lecture theatre are medical and legal students.

Ladies and Gentlemen. Let me introduce myself in this way - what I am about to claim could be a fabricated scenario but at the end of these presentations you ought to be able to work this out. So, call me Darth. I am a psychic of a certain kind. I am also an expert in the human mind using a new and possibly novel technique of exploring the brain and mind. Such things are explained and detailed on our medical pages. I am also what is called the first-born of my kind, which makes me their head, like a king I guess. Male first-borns among my kind are extremely rare, with only Moses and Jesus counted as our prior first-borns. My people have their own Holy Book known as the Third Testament. According to that book, to the myths and legends in that document which by the way is also available from the psychic web pages, I am also the Holy Spirit or the Spirit of Truth in the old jargon. I guess, if anyone is an expert on law, then the Hebrew God must surely be since the proper notion of law began with the Old Testament. It follows therefore that if I am what I am, according to our myths and legends, then the nature of law is part of my genetic heritage. So, if you are prepared to entertain this until you are in a position to use the Science of Law to prove this one way or the other, I am indeed the Holy Spirit.

All right, how much of the above is so? By the end of these presentations, you should be able to use the Science of Law to work that out exactly and precisely.

Let me begin this presentation.

Why do you want to study law? The answer for most of you is that you want to be successful and have lots of money, and you see law as the way to achieve this goal. In Australia, that is true, likely true in other countries because law is big business.

However, before I talk about proper law which our people rarely use but we do have the Science of Law, as we know this, I need to explain to you something about your own brain. (Image on white board behind Darth of a brain). The human brain is in fact three brains. The left cerebral hemisphere, the right cerebral hemisphere, and the small brain located underneath the other two, the cerebellum. Connecting the two brains is a band of neural tissue called the corpus callosum. The nature of the two brains is very different. In most people the left is the dominant brain and the logical brain, while the right has more to do with processing feelings. In some people this is the other way around, and in the rare person both brains seem to share functions that in most people the left performs.

The brain is mostly designed to look after the body - moving your hands, arms, lips, maintaining gait and posture, such things. The back of the brain is the visual cortex which is the most highly evolved sense in the animal-human. Note my use of the term "animal-human"? Our ego wants us to think we are not animals but in fact we share the traits of animals. The brain of a monkey is smaller but not that different in structure to the human brain. Certain parts of the brain are much the same in all species of animals that have a central nervous system.

The intellectual and reasoning capacity is limited to a relatively small area of the frontal lobes (imagine being shown this on the board). Due to the fact the human brain is naturally limited in its capacity to reason, another structure called the ego in psychiatry tends to fools our conscious into thinking our reason is superior to what it in fact is.

Now, legal thinking can cause fixations and delusions in the brain. Problem is this. You are given a legal definition, say "financial hardship". Your left brain accepts this and attempts to memorize this definition and what it means. In order to memorize, it needs the assistance of the right brain. The right brain has spatial capacity in three dimensions, while the left brain only has this in two dimensions. In other words, explained simply, only the right brain can see a picture as a whole, can truly perceive what is happening, while the left brain reduces this perception to an appreciation which can be simply understood by our reason. Now, when the left attempts to get assistance from the right to put financial hardship in perspective, in focus, this does not always work. That is because the legal definition of "financial hardship" is likely to also state what is considered financial hardship. In other words, you need to narrow your understanding of this legal term to how it is defined. That definition may not suit the right side of the brain which may rightly conclude that there is much more to financial hardship than what you have been told is the legal definition. When this happens, a strong magnetic like barrier begins to form between the two brains. We can call this a "will". It is not a natural will by any means, it is an artificial will. This will has to reduce the input from the right brain when you reflect on financial hardship in order that your legal definition you have been given, is not messed up or confused.

From a purely neuroscientific point of view, what this truly means is that the study of law could be equally called the study of bullshit. If the right brain can not get the picture in the focus, then what the left comes up with is equivalent to an "imaginary" or "invented" scenario which may be completely devoid of reality, truth, facts, or evidence.

Why is that, you might ask? What is law about? The naive person thinks it is about justice. In almost every country, the aim of the legal system is to protect the wealthy from the masses. This is something a normal mentally healthy right brain actually does understand you see. When it forms perceptions, everything has to be in focus and in perspective. If you deny to yourself that the point of any legal system is about protecting wealth, then your right brain becomes less and less involved in matters to do with law. When the human brain does not use its internal thinking and memory cells and areas, it may kill these off. That means that you, as a lawyer, may be working with a brain that has half the capacity of a normal healthy brain. By that time, you may have castrated and isolated your right brain so much it may have begun killing off its own internal memory and knowledge areas.

The study of law is also an equation and recipe for making yourself mentally dysfunctional. Not a problem for you if you are into money, if this is what you think law is about. A dominant left brain that is dysfunctional has a greater chance of winning legal cases than a natural brain. The more the information is ignored from the right brain, the simple the issue becomes.

Say you are a professional lawyer. A client comes to you complaining of financial hardship and can something be done about this. If you can have empathy with a person in that position, then your brain is not dysfunctional. Further, the right brain will completely cooperate with the left in trying to find some solutions valid-in-law. For example, the person may be eligible for supplementary social benefit. On the other hand, if you have no capacity to have empathy with what financial hardship is, then your brain is already dysfunctional, the right and left are like isolated islands rarely communicating. This in turn can result in you loosing friends, family, respect.

The more you study law, the more "animal" like your brain can become. An animal brain is largely controlled by instinct. In an animal-human, the primary instincts are domination and control and punishment and reward. From these, other instinct develop. Not every person in the world is an animal-human, but nine our of ten are. This definition of "animal-human" comes about from the psychic Science of Life. According to their theory, evolution is largely determined by energy entities called dimensions. Interaction between these can result in a new species of life emerging genetically. Classical evolution will lead you to believe that Man had emerged from the Ape. Not so according to the Science of Life. Man emerged from the interaction of the "ape" dimension with a "carnivore" dimension. The carnivore dimension is very much about control and domination, it is very much about pissing on one's own territory then defending such to the death. That is also the nature of the animal-human. From the ape dimension, the mother dimension if you will, Man emerged and learned how to use tools. From the carnivore dimension, the father if you will, Man learnt how to fight and destroy in order to acquire what Man wanted.

Let me put down an assertion that the legal system is an extension of that primeval urge to control and dominate. That it is not about justice, that is what television wants to make you believe; that it is not about "we all live by the same rules", that is what politicians want you to believe. The legal system is always about control and domination in order to protect wealth from the masses who have less wealth.

At this point you need to test the truth of my assertion above. In a normal brain, the right ought not have that much problem with my assertion, thinking to itself, "well, that's one point of view and I can see why he claims this", but the left ought not have a problem dismissing this view and rationalizing along the lines, "yes, well, Man is imperfect and the legal system may not be perfect but it serves a useful and good purpose and serves most people, wealthy or poor".

All right, having presented the overall picture, let me explain why the psychics refer to their way of law as a science. Consider: Is it legally correct to say that 2+4 = 6? This is "mathematical reasoning" but is it also "legal reasoning?" Let us assume, without evidence, that mathematics is in fact a legal field of study. Let us, assume, again without evidence, that providing "mathematical reasoning" is performed by a qualified mathematician, then this is valid legal reasoning also. We need to prove or validate our assumptions. What is a "mathematician?" Let us define a mathematician as anyone capable of mathematical reasoning. Anyone could mean a calculator too. If we accept this as "valid-in-law", then clearly our assumptions are automatically validated and 2+4=6 is indeed legal reasoning. What ingredients do we need to define law? Definitions which are as solid or common sense as possible. The simpler the definitions the better. We need a frame of reference. The laws of particle dynamics belong to the physics field of science, hence science would be the correct frame of reference. When dealing with law, a framework of law is the correct frame of reference, providing it has not been polluted. In the Science of Law we make no assumptions, never. Either we "do know" something as a fact, or we "do not know". Let us consider an example from the Alzheimer's Scam report. In which a geriatric specialist writes a medical report about a woman with stage 6 Alzheimer's, and in that report he claims she has "testament capacity". Is this legally correct? This is a qualified doctor, true, but in medicine there is no such thing as the "diagnosis or assessment of testament capacity". No respected medical source will explain this, no clinical trials of any kind had ever been held about such a matter. Now, if a mathematician wrote a report about how sound a building was in his opinion, would you place much merit on this report? I mean, it is possible the mathematician was spot on, but we do not know this. Would you not insist a qualified building inspector writes such a report? Is this not also so for medicine? Is this person the correct medical specialist to assess a person's "testament capacity". You begin to seek an answer but as you do you find that there is no such thing as "testament capacity" in medicine. What then does the report of the medical specialist mean? Buggar all is the answer - the specialist was either fooled by a lawyer or was paid money to include those words in the report. That is your legal conclusion and you dismiss such a report. You could seek out the advice of psychiatrists who specialise in the mind, and ask this, but chances are most will laugh at you for even thinking that a person whose brain has largely been destroyed (as Alzheimer's does, it is a degenerative brain disease) can have "testament capacity." As long as you approach law as a science, the risk of your brain becoming dysfunctional is minimal, perhaps no more than in any other person. Now, another way of avoiding your own brain getting messed up, is to seek the advice of specialists in a field. That's all very well as long as you find the correct specialist. Unfortunately, in some fields, the ego of a specialist can get in their way if they are asked about something they are not equipped to study or explore, and they may think they are perfectly qualified to do so. Medicine is a field in which the ego of a physician can get in their way. Politics is another such field. Bank executives are another group prone to this, as perhaps some others.

A dysfunctional brain is not necessarily compelled by the ego to come up with decisions that appear solid and sound. All of us have had a strong toothache. When this happens, no matter what you try and do, you are so aware of that toothache! That is because where the primary focus of the brain is, there is the awareness. In other words, if a group of cells in the brain are highly active, that is when the focus or primary consciousness of the brain is. When accepting legal precedents as gospel, the same thing can happen. A bad decision or a poor line of reasoning, can distort the legal frame of reference. An example. In Australia a body called the Guardianship Tribunal is in theory there to protect dementia victims from fraud by family members, so they can legally assign a guardian and power of attorney. However, in my research, this body had made itself useless by its own precedents and line of thinking. It seems some senior court judge had at one point deliberated on a decision to do with "capacity". His ego got the better of the man, and he decided his fine line of reasoning about "capacity" applies to all aspects of law. Consequently, this tribunal is now under the impression a person who brain is virtually destroyed from a medical point of view, can still have "capacity" to make certain decisions including signing a new Last Will and Testament.

Notice the persuasive power of this argument. That is because your left brain "loves" this type of two dimensional view. If you only use your left brain, the world will seem ever so simple and you can move complications aside very easily.

Say you are an experience professional lawyer. Say you know about these decisions of the Guardianship Tribunal. Say you have a client whose elderly parent has Alzheimer's and is not longer even aware of what she is or where she is, but your client sees his or her chance at getting a new Last Will and Testament engineered. So he comes to you and claims his parent wants to leave everything to you alone but there is a will in place and what can be done about it? Say you are a typical Anglo-Saxon lawyer with no ethics or morals of any kind. Say you know about these decisions of the Guardianship Tribunal. So, you work out a scheme. You get your client to drag the parent to a medical hospital specialist (has to be a hospital specialist, these are usually young and inexperienced, and their ego is strong) and then claim all sorts of thing and also explain about the decisions of the Guardianship Tribunal and that "testament capacity" only means this and that. The specialist, naive as hell, accepts what you tell him and writes you such a report. This is then whisked off to a specialist legal firm and a new Last Will and Testament has been engineered. What you have done is assisted a crime, property theft, but this had been done using the legal system so it can not be called a criminally. In practice, the study of law can also be claimed to be the study of bullshit, of white collar crime and how to go about it. Further, the most expensive a legal system is, the more likely it is corrupt as hell as the junior court and tribunal levels. In Australia, I have had professional solicitors (lawyers) telling me not to waste my time bringing any case to local courts because these are a joke and many corrupt as hell with the usual forms of corruption is signing court orders as favours for legal firms. Problem is, that is all most people can afford, the local courts and tribunals. Let's just go over this. Again, can you see that you begin to be persuaded by this argument? You are on the verge of accepting that this thing about testament capacity actually makes sense. Why? That is because it is the left side of your brain that is understanding this simple technique. Your right brain is not involved. To involve your right brain, you have to put yourself in the shoes of the son or daughter of the victim, in this case the frail elderly with Alzheimer's. How do you think such would feel if their parent was manipulated in this way and it all appeared perfectly legal? How would the parent feel if they were of sound mind? How would you feel if you had five children and one was a drug addict who suddenly worked out how to engineer a new Last Will and Testament giving everything to himself alone? To understand the Science of Law, you have to understand right and wrong also, else law becomes much like it is in most countries, a means to an end, a craft of manipulation and fabrication, not about fairness, justice, or rules by which we all live by. On what basis do you understand right and wrong? If you have a strong, say Christian, set of ethics, you may understand on the basis of these. Fair enough, as long as you understand right and wrong, it does not matter what reference source you use. I am not persuaded that Christian views about right and wrong in general, or Islamic views, or Hindu views, are that dissimilar. Note that when a person says, "well, Jesus said to have two witnesses before you bring a charge against someone, and I accept this", the fact that they are referring to Jesus as their role-model is incidental, clearly they have accepted this view as their own also.

Presentation - Second Part, Informal Presentation

All right, ladies and gentleman. This lady on my right that has come in to assist is Helen. She is wearing a red business suit as you can see. In ordinary life she is the wife of a Rabbi. We both have aged of course but you can probably tell from looking at my friend that she is, and was, a lovely looking woman. Her blond hair a touch unusual if you think of Jews in Israel, but her background is actually German Jewry. Helen was born in Australia. Now, let me suggest this to you. All right, imagine a time some twenty five years ago. This young woman, she is but was more so then quite a looker, is in a short summer dress and sitting on a seat in a park. She has super long legs and her figure is striking, and this you can probably still see. Now, I am coming into the city and just had a job interview and have been asked to attend a second interview in about three hours time. So I have to waste a few hours waiting. My wife at the time, knowing these interviews tend to drag on, made me lunch so I am now looking for a place to eat it. The park is crowded, people on seats, but I see this one park bench with this young woman eating her lunch. Her skirt was rather brief at that time and I must admit it was those long slim legs that caught my attention, but I am human.

I will ask Helen to sit down behind me on that chair while I explain how we met.

Anyway, so I sit down next to her and start to eat.

"Are you John?" Suddenly she turns and asks.

I turn, smile, shake my head. "No, my name is Darth. I am just wasting time until another interview."

"Oh." She replied with a lovely smile. "Sorry. I meant to meet a person called John. He had this, uhm, religious fantasy U guess you would call it. I was getting alarmed. I hope he does come. He agreed to come. Of course, if it is you, I don't mind you being shy about it."

"You don't know what this person looks like?" I asked.

"No. She shook her head. "I am a wife to a Rabbi, sometimes answer his calls. This morning I got a call from this man who seemed so deeply troubled and spoke of strange things. I became worried. I said that I was going to the city at lunch time and if he wants to meet me and talk to me, I will be waiting in Hyde Park near the war memorial, sitting and eating lunch. I mentioned I would wear a white top and a red skirt - then when I set about looking for the red skirt, I found this one instead, and the only red one I had, and I had not worn it since...well...I was much younger."

"Ah." I reply, quite fascinated by this. "Well, if you are a good at religious riddles...try this...I had a dream yesterday, and in the dream an angel of God said I was to go to this park and sit next to a woman that was lovely, with a white shirt and red skirt. That she was to be my wife. Wonder what that means?"

"Bullshit!" She laughed.

"Well, come on, you can do better than this. Let's say I am...uhm...uhm...the Holy Spirit...as a man...and you are the wife God has chosen for me. How do you go about dismissing this?"

"Honestly." She turned, I thought she had lost interest, but then she turned to me and smiled. "All right. How might I go about this? So you claim you are Holy. On what basis?"

"On what basis?" I replied. "Well, I am sitting next to a wife of a Rabbi and she is beautiful to me. My spirit sees your spirit, surely that is why you seem so..divine even."

Helen blushed and turned aside, then turned back to me, studied me with her eyes. "All right, Mr Wise guy. On that basis, by the laws of Moses in my heart, I could not dismiss your claim - neither am I accepting it as true. Go on, persuade me in such a way as to believe."

"Well, uhm, how about this?" I continue. "I worked as a crisis counselor for Saint Vincent's de Paul. Its a Catholic organization. I spoke and assisted people in crisis situation. One day this woman came to me and told me a tale I found hard to believe. I refused to believe it in fact. A few months later another woman comes in with much the same story. Again, I am suspicious, it was not making sense. Come a time a third person, this time a man, comes in with the story. This time I get angry. You see, what these people are telling me was that local courts in Australia sell these court orders called AVOs. Supposedly to be about violence but in fact they seem to be sold through legal firms, based on no truth but lies invented by expensive specialist legal firms, and are used as the basis of legal scams - to defraud family of the estate of the elderly, to get hold of an elderly's bank account, and even for the purpose of attaining a child sex slave. So, I do much research on this. I come to suspect this is the case. So, me and Moses, that's my nickname for this step-brother I have who is a solicitor, come up with a plan to test this in the courts. We do, and succeed, and the result is something called the Alzheimer's Scam which is on my professional medical web pages for all doctors to understand. How is that for the work of the Holy Spirit?"

"Not bad, if it is true, give me the name of your web site so I can see that." Helen responded with a laugh, clearly not believing this tale.

So I give her my business card which had my web site on it and I make her promise that she will return the next day to this same seat if she is satisfied that what I told her was the truth.

The next day I find the park again and Helen is waiting. This time her skirt is a touch longer, but not that much.

"So, you are back!" I smiled as I sit down.

"I am and this is now very serious with me. That web site of yours, is wonderful, is special, it tells of shocking crimes against humanity by Australian local courts." Helen was serious.

"They are not Australian, its a deadshit Anglo-Saxon mentality that runs the courts. Shit after shit, not Australian." I replied off the cuff. "The deadshits invented their own language which seems English but in fact it is far removed from natural English."

"Ah? I am a republican myself, but that is besides the point. I could help you. I know people who...well...have had problems with the courts...they could tell you stories." Helen said.

"You can assist me by clearing my head. I can't go into this, you would think I am insane, but I would like someone who has some...some....skill...and knowledge...to persuade me that I can't be possibly the Holy Spirit." I replied.

"Oh, stop that. Anyone who does the work of God in the right spirit has every right to feel they are special, even holy." Helen smiled.

"Yes, I know, but this is more complex with me....has to do with...with..this stupid dream my mother once had and told me when I was young...did not make sense at the time but now and then I can't help wondering about it...in that dream, and it sounded so mystical, she was fully persuaded by what she called an angel that her first-born, this was before I was born, had the "grace of Mary" and would be "Holy" in the eyes of the believers." I explained the matter the best I could. I did not wish to go into the myths and legends of my people, feeling or rather fearing this would put her off me and she was lovely to look at, had a lovely smile, and I rather enjoyed being with her.

"Oh...I don't know...I am only the wife of a Rabbi." Helen replied. "My husband might be better at this...his name is Frank...seems to me I don't have a right to dismiss or disprove that claim of yours. Tell me, what does God ask of his Holy Spirit in this generation?"

"Ah." I began to reflect on this. "Well, to educate people about certain matters to do with law, medicine, science, such things. That is about as much as I could discern. The Internet is an ideal educational took - it is a question of finding the right way to go about it."

"I suppose." She replied and stands. "Come walk with me?"

We begin to walk. I marvel at the style and grace in her movements. I am wishing to myself I was not married and was a Jew because this young woman was truly turning me on, not physically in a sense as good looking as she was, but it was her natural charm, her soft voice, her smile especially. I did like her long  blond hair too.

"If you are the Son of God." She turns to me and smiles, and points to a homeless man laying near one of the long seats in this park. "Grace this man."

"Why do you assume he is not graced?" I reply as we stop. "Our materialist nature makes us feel this man is a looser, a man unlucky, we even suspect he may be an alcoholic or has a mental illness and the reason he is homeless. From a human point of view, true, I can see the man could use some help, especially money. From God's point of view, where is the fault in this man? I can not see it."

"Let's move along." She put her hand around my upper arm and we walked off. "Listen." I recall Helen brushed back my hair with her hand, it fell in part over my eyes as we rushed off. "You like challenges? Riddles? Let me put one to you. There is this Jewish tradition. It is called Life in the Spirit. A mystical experience. Jews in the spirit lead a dual way of life. In the spirit, even a married woman such as I is eligible to accept a husband in the spirit. I am willing, if you are, to learn about this. The only thing is, if we get that far, there is this complication. A man and a woman, who accept one another in the spirit, also have to...well...sleep together at least once."

I stopped, puzzled, studying her. I take her hand and lead her to a seat and make her sit down. "Now, I used to work as a crisis counselor. What you just said, rang an alarm bell. There is a problem in your marriage?"

For a while Helen did not say anything, had her head turned, then turned to me and said softly with a tear in her eye. "Well, my husband had an affair."

I took a deep breath then stood, walked away a touch, turned, studied Helen from different angles. I sat down again. "Your husband is an idiot! Why would a man who had a wife who looked as sexy and fantastic as you, want an affair?"

"I don't know!" Helen snapped and turned aside. "The woman he did it with, almost ugly seems to me, hardly a figure. I don't know but neither can I easily excuse or forgive - except I do have a young daughter and the thought of separation or divorce does not appeal to me."

"Wow!" I replied, mostly because I was nervous by this time and not sure what to say. "My Catholic wife would not hesitate to divorce me if I had an affair. We were...virgins...when we first came together you see, the notion of no faith in a marriage is beyond her or me...so I don't know, I can not understand, how you can forgive."

"Don't be so certain." Helen smiled, at the time she moved closer to me and put her hand around my upper arm. "I leave my daughter with my sister when I have to come into the city. She is only three, her name is Sara. She has black hair, that's from her father. Anyway, what do you actually do? Your business card mentions a web site and some computer software?"

"Oh, that's my small business, I have developed and sell some medical expert diagnosis software to doctors mainly, sometimes hospitals. Not much of a market. Doctors are not used to computer assisted diagnosis." I replied.

"Let's walk." She smiled and stood and we walked again. "So, so far." She glanced at me in that sensual way a woman knows how. "We are equal in this. You want me to disprove you are the Holy Spirit. Fine. I want you to disprove that what I explained about Jewish Life in the Spirit. How is that for a challenge?"

"Helen. Let me say this. Just from talking to you, my guess as to why Frank had an affair, is this: you are so highly intelligent and that he does not like in you."

"I know...but nice to have someone else come to the same conclusion." Helen smiled.

All right, ladies and gentlemen. The point of this information presentation is this: while we spoke in plain English to one another, we in fact used the right side of the brain to reveal to one another a great many things. If you know the Science of Law, you are in a position to translate our plain language into, in this case, the language of the spirit. So, in fact, the first time I sat next to Helen, the spirit in me wanted to pass her a message namely "you are my wife by the will of God." That flow translated by the left brain came out the way it had, but Helen's spirit understood. Somewhere in this conversation that I narrated to you, she accepted being my wife in the spirit. Can you spot when and how and the reason? Try to get a feel for what the Science of Law is and how to use it. I put it to you that, if you truly understand the Science of Law, and you then study the Third Testament, and you come to the conclusion the opening sections are true, then you will be in exactly the same position as my people the psychics - they have no idea how to disprove their own myths and legends. What does it mean when something can not be disproved using the Science of Law? That is a mystery.