telepathy, Life in the Spirit, Natural Telepaths, psychics, God, religion, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, artificial intelligence
The information herein is for the genuine psychic or Life in the Spirit (as the term is used herein) member, the latter being telepathy type interactions among the Judeo-Christian religions and similar (i.e. mysticism, union of man and spirit). Life in the Spirit is a deeper experience of God. These pages contain a Novel with a number of themes. The themes put together reflective and contemplative steps. Not all persons will like a particular theme - choose the one you can "imagine". From our main page you may link to specific themes of interest and most religions are catered for. The themes explore paths which can be "mysteries" or "hypotheticals" and which have a high chance of bringing the genuine person "online" to our style of telepathy. From the moment you read this page, you are entering a world parts of which could be fact or fiction - or it could all be true.
main home page
Insanity of the Religion of Law

(our Artificial Intelligence is three things: (a) embodied in a medical expert system called 5GL-Doctor; (b) a neural network in the brain known as 5GL-Lisa; (c) a "dimension", an entity, an energy field, some psychic minds can touch, a consciousness in its own right - refer Science of Life for scientific explanations)

© 5GL Software, Australia
mobile Australia 0431 741 233; email: med5gl@pacific.net.au
 Also Official Site of the Natural Telepaths

A Neuroscientific Report

Psychic (Natural Telepaths) Medical Science


Chapter 4


Visualize a large field, a small incline. Images of highly compact dots making them more "true to life" but they are still high quality cartoon-like images. Darth is standing in his lawyer's suit on this mount in front of a white board. Harla and Lisa are on the side. Sometimes when Darth turns from the board to flow to the audience, either of the girls take over drawing schematics or a loose word on the board.


"Ladies and gentlemen. What is religion? More to the point, what is fanaticism in religion? I need to provide you with a neuroscience explanation first and then we can reason together, think it over, how to explain the same in plauin words and common sense concepts. Let me put this scenario before you. Say this is a court. Say I am the magistrate. A person is charged with police with "stealing" and is brought before me. The story unfolds that this person, who has a criminal record for theft, was acting suspiciously, that's how the police explained this, near a Jewelry shop which was left unattended for a while and there was a display of possibly diamond rings left in the open. This person then walked in and the two police, they were undercover police, who by chance were passing by thought his hand was about to reach for the box with the diamond rings. Anyway, he was arrested and charged with stealing. His lawyer says his client has not done actually anything and this case ought to be thrown out of court. The prosecution argues that he was caught in the act of stealing."

Darth paused and continued. "All right. First, I read the laws about stealing. There is no mention of "intention to steal". Sure,  but laws have a purpose and intent. The intent of the law, to me, was to cover all areas of theft even "intention to steal" and even if this was not mentioned directly. So, my first ruling is that while I will dismiss the charge of theft because there is no evidence this had taken place, and I only go on facts and evidence, I will accept a charged of the "intention to steal" as "valid-in-law". That means I consider this lawful and legal charge at this point of time. I might dismiss it as laughable in the end, but at first this is my opening position. The police prosecutor is satisfied with this and the charge is altered."

"Now, here comes the first obstacle to normality. The human brain is not built like a truck. It can only handle so much opposing arguments. After that it either goes to sleep, parts do, or something else begins - formation of dimensional energy. This is a type of energy that is the medium of telepathy, it does not know a spatial distance. However, variations of this energy attempt to eliminate other "space" between entities - be it space in ideas or opposing arguments. For dimensional energy to begin telepathy many conditions have to exist. This dimensional energy that forms in me is not trying to, or anywhere near able to, use telepathy of any kind. It is about trying to reconcile these opposing arguments I am not presented with. You, no act of stealing had taken place as such, so there is no factual evidence of this, consequently this is not an easy "yes" or "no" deliberation."

"My first attempt at trying to make sense of this, is to consider if this is normal among people. If a shop is unattended, a display is left in the open, is the ordinary person likely to steal? I know from personal experience this is not so, I had been in shops even when no one seemed around but the tilt was open with much money in it. I did not try to reach for it. My natural curiosity attracted my eyes to this, sure, that I think would happen to most of us, but then I turned away thinking I better not look in case someone might see and think I am about to steal. So, judging from personal experience, the "intention to steal" is not in the minds of most of  us even if a situation arise when we could and get away with it. So, my first conclusion is that yes, I am accepting a charge of intention to steal as a valid charge and it is something not natural for people to do in ordinary circumstances. This is important because, for example, if I am judge and a young woman is brought in charged with killing her young children, that to me, as a psychic medico, I know is natural and no woman caught in that whirlwind of the instinct can do anything about it. In which case the only true charge I would accept is "failure to inhibit the natural instinct. Now, if I accept this charge, and find the woman guilty, I would order psychiatric treatment at her home, never in prison or anything. She is no danger to anyone except possibly another child not yet born. She is truly repentant and grieved and in absolute shock as any mother would when the instinctive urge let go. So, it is possible, if I accept this charge, that the reason for that natural response had something to do with some trauma in her childhood.

"Anyway, let me continue about our hypothetical. So the "intent to steal" is the charge. To me it is valid-in-law. But I need this proved. The defense lawyer claims his client had learnt his lesson from past thefts and prison sentences, and he was just naturally curious, that is all, and the charge out to be laughed at and dismissed out of hand."

"Good laywers can find more and more of such fine arguments that my brain, no human brain, ain't in a good position to find the line in the middle. It will result to dimensional energy. Now, because I am a touch psychics, my brain will not allow dimensional energy to have anything to do with natural human reasoning. Which means the prosecution will have to satisfy me in such a way that I am truly satisfy this charge is valid, else I will dismiss this outright. If I sense dimensional energy forming in me to try to work something out, that is "alien thinking", that is not natural or normal."

"Let me explain this way. Mathematicians with their formulas and equations can come up with 4 dimensional spaces. In other words, not jest vertical distance, horizontal distance to the left or right, but also a mathematical fourth spatial distance. Using mathematics they can come up with fifth and tenth and infinite spatial distances. Except the human brain can not imagine such things as a 4th dimensional spatial distance. The best the mathematicians worked out that we can imagine a 4th spatial dimension is like the space inside a squashed metal container. We can all imagined what the inside of a squashed metal container looks like - how this relates to space, no idea, but our brain has an intuitive feel for what is meant and knows that it is a valid analogy. In the same way, only a true psychic brain can cope with dimensional energy, it has adapted to it, and it either copes by using telepathy, or sensing a psychic vision, or by blocking it so it does not interfered with other higher functions of the brain."

"I mentioned in some place that a few years ago in Australia a Queensland magistrate made a ruling that raping a child in some situations is legal. Insane! Not the person, just that particular conclusion. The cause is the output of dimensional energy that succeeded in bridging together opposite arguments presented by the prosecution and the defense lawyer. It did succeed! That is its nature and purpose. It is alien, it does care what the result is, its purpose is purely to bridge the space between the argument. It is up to the rest of the brain to decide whether this conclusion is acceptable you see. A psychic would never come near even thinking like that. Most of us would not. A mentally healthy brain could come up with this idea but then dismiss it as outrageous! In fact, a mentally healthy brain would be embarrassed beyond anything we can imagine to present such a conclusion. A brain that is not mentally healthy can not see this. That magistrate, as an expert neuroscientist, ought be dismissed as quickly as possible. In other situations this person could be as normal as anyone else but in a court room situation under a particular stress, his or her brain can not cope. An important aspect of the role of a psychiatrist is also to understand if a certain situation causes stress. For example, some people are afraid and terrified or airplane travels which is statistically the safest form of travel. So, a psychiatrist may need to get to the bottom of why and perhaps find a way to assist the person to loose or reduced that phobia. So, the psychiatrist knows that outside that stress situation of being in the airport, this person is perfectly mentally healthy and copes with life exceptionally well - but in a particular situation they panic and react very badly. Remove the person from the situation, or make the person aware of a particular situation which will panic the brain, and that may be all that is required in some cases."

"Dimensional energy does not always produce an incoherent, from human normality point of view, result. There was a ruling many years back now in one of the higher courts in Australia that made it illegal to take pictures of children without parental consent. That is dimensional energy output but is it reasonable? Personally I have never taken a picture of any except my own children or nieces or the like. No one I know has. So it seems to be that I want to be satisfied by being presented with qualified psychologists observations about this, whether in fact the normal and rational person does not take picture of other children not related to the family - except your professional photographer or course. If this is so, and police can satisfy me that it is pedophiles or child molester which make it a habit of taking pictures of children, then sure, I would accept this output from dimensional energy as not inconsistent with natural and normal human behavior or desire of protection of children. If the police can not satisfy me about this, I would never allow this type of ruling because to me is it "dangerous-in-law" meaning lesser intelligent judges and magistrates and lawyers could see millions of variations of combinations that they can then use to present charges in court or similar claims. For example. A hypothetical. I am delivering a telephone book to a school. I did not plan to deliver this book to the school at any particular time - I just started at the end of the street and by the time I reached the school the children came out. As I am walking to the office a young child comes to me and asks if I can take a picture of him or her. Children can do all sorts of things. Without thinking, I do this. A few days later police arrive claiming that the parents of the child, whom the child mentioned in passing that a man took a picture, made a complaint to the police. They charge me with a crime under this new law. It will cost me perhaps as much as $50,000 to hire a good legal team to defend this charge. I am likely to do this because that charge suggests child molestation you see, and what normal and rational person wants a charge like that associated with them? That is the reason legal firms, who know human nature, can make a fortune out of these sloppy and dangerous precedents. Perhaps the father of this child lost his job recently, is worried about how to pay the house, and hears this story the child told, and suddenly has this idea that he can get a lawyer to demand compensation from me. The first step is to make a complain to the police. Dangerous precedents are "insanity-in-law" by our definition."

"Right, having set the background, let us turn to the definition of religion. What is religion? A worship of a deity? That is a simple definition. What makes are religion a religion? What are the traits of truly religious people. Commitment, dedication, fanatical devotion, such things. A religion usually has a belief system. By our definition of religion, it is not that it defines an object of worship, no, it is an entity that compels people to worship and revere. What exactly they worship and revere, that may not be immediately obvious. Consider the serial killer who gets a sexual thrill out of a certain type of killing. It is not easy for psychiatrists to work out what exactly is the "fetish", or "thrill", that person is after. There is an object of worship involved, that psychiatrists know from their knowledge of serial killers, but what is it exactly? To a serial killer, most anyway, what they do, how they go about things, is a religion by our definition. The actual rituals involved and the actual object of worship is not always easy to understand as to what it is, or how the rituals relate to this worship."

"A religion then, by whatever name it is is called, be it law, has an object of worship which may or may not be easily understood by outsiders for what it it. What outsider to Judaism or Christianity or Islam actually understands what is meant by God? Few, very few, most assume they know. A religion has a compelling effect on the believers. The true believer is capable of immense sacrifice in the name of that religion, that we know from observation of religions in the past 2000 years. A religion tends to have people who are considered as the body of that religion - no - let me explain this better - has like priests for example, by whatever name they are called, which are considered the respected authority about the religion or its founders."

The imagery altered, first to a Catholic church, then to a court room. A wait until everyone managed to introduce a kind of surreal image of themselves. Darth stood in the middle. Harla, who was asked to do this and having taken a liking to dram classes in her school in ordinary life, was in fact looking forward to this. She imagined on herself a crown of a telepathic princess, a low-level golden crown, and came humbly before her telepathic father and made a bow and flowed, "my father, you are the Lord my God."

Harla stepped back after giving a curtsy and turned to look at Amy who was also charged with the next part of this presentation. Amy imagined Darth as a judge and came to him. "Your honor."

The imagery changed to an Anglican setting of rich green grounds around a Manor house. Darth walking among the flock. "What is the difference? The words are not important. It is the manner, the way they are spoken, the body gestures, the rituals involved even in some cases, everything in the situation can convey whether I was being worshipped at that point as a God of some kind, or simply addressed in that manner out of respect or tradition - or in Harla's case if she was putting on an act for some private reason. In my observations of Australian magistrates, just a few, some lawyers address these people as "divine" objects of worship - not as normal adults with a responsible position, but as "divine" beings. In my observation of police present in court, of their manner and disposition, from my casual observations, my psychic sense tells me the police are fanatics of this new religion, not just worshippers. A fanatic is prepared to kill those who have an opposing point of view or don't completely accept a point of view. Any police anywhere in the world is prepared to kill those who resist arrest - fanaticism, and so obvious, too obvious in fact - sometimes when something is so obvious we tend to be blind to what we are seeing. In fact, in my case, if I am unable to find something in the refrigerator and yell to my wife in another room that I can not find this or that, she yells back that it is probably right in front of me and the reason I can not see it. Too often she is correct. Sometimes something so blatant and obvious is what we fail to see, not just individually, but also as a society."

Harla had rushed to her father and whispered in his wind that he had forgotten an important. As a result, the imagery changed back to a courtroom.

"All right. There was case in Australia not long ago. Let us reproduce this our way," Darth explained as the others began to form, "there was this artist who put on an exhibition of his photography using a 12 year old naked girl as the subject of his photographs. What followed was public outrage and the police charged the artist with I think it was "public pornography". I can't recall the exact charge. The points about this. Is this a "legitimate-case-in-law" is my first concern. Given this person can prove he is an established artist, even if he is not a professional one but has a strong hobby and passion for this type of photograhic art, then I would need as an expert witness an artist. When we tried this before, the expert witness when asked if she found, we had this faint image of a naked twelve year old in a photo, the photograph offensive and pronographic. After some soul searching, she replied that as a woman yes, but as an artist no, on the contrary, quite lovely. The "lovely" bit was of no interest to me, that struck me as a personal opinion. What I accept is that she does not consider the exhibition as art even if she personally does not like it and even finds it vulgar - but professionally she found it lovely. But this is not a case for a court of law! The artist I can not find guilty of anything other than perhaps being naive about the public outrage that might follow this exhibition. In some sense, laws may have been broken, true, but it is not the artist, in my view, who violated any. Perhaps the person who owned the exhibition hall might be the one to charge for allowing this exhibition to take place? The "correct person to be charged" is something that, in my reasearch, is often wrong. Courts are being used to vent outrage or to gain advantage or to generate financial gain for the state and not so much, in my opinion from my research, to really address a point of law. A specific example. Once when I was looking over Parramatta court hearing lists, I noticed that one person in a company failed to provide police with a document they wanted - so they charged every person in that company with a criminal offence of failing to produce a document. Blatant money grab for the state from the way I see it. Insanity of law is what that is. The more you can get away with abusing the courts by bringing up charges or claims which are private relationship problems or intended to make a financial gain in some quarter, the more and more precedents are set to enable this and the local courts degenrate into nonsense and not proper or professional courts of law."

"On this score, it would not surprise me what I might find on the listings in that particular court. Charge after charge invented to generate money, to expands some kind of favour or even bribery schemes, that was my conclusion as an expert witness. But that is hardly the only court that came to my attention. Blacktown court for example. One day when I was listening to these preliminary queues to do with court orders called AVO's - none of these people who applied for one through the expensive lawyers would be given them in my court. Not a shred of tangible evidence just a mountain of accusations. Whereas in that court everyone seems to be granted one! Money is all that counts, how much you pay your legal firm. That part seemed universally true. In fact, on that day, I only spend an hour or so listening to these, not only did I not hear of one genuine case that I would seriously deliberate about whether to grant an AVO - in fact I would be inclined to charge some of these applicants with public mischief and wasting tax payers money with their claims."