telepathy, Life in the Spirit, Natural Telepaths, psychics, God, religion, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, artificial intelligence
| The information
herein
is for
the genuine psychic
or Life in the
Spirit (as the term is used herein)
member, the
latter being telepathy
type interactions among the
Judeo-Christian religions
and similar (i.e. mysticism,
union of man and spirit).
Life in the Spirit is a
deeper experience of God.
These pages contain a Novel with
a number of themes. The themes
put together reflective and
contemplative steps. Not all persons
will like a particular theme -
choose the one you can "imagine".
From our main page you may link to specific themes
of interest and most religions are catered for. The
themes explore paths which can be "mysteries" or "hypotheticals"
and which have a high chance of bringing the genuine
person "online" to our style of telepathy. From the moment
you read this page, you are entering a world parts of
which could be fact or fiction - or it could all be true. |
You are a practicing psychiatrist accredited in neuroscience in psychiatry. You have been asked to do an unusual consultancy by the Australian Defense Forces (or say American if you are an American, or German if you are German, whatever). Something bizarre had taken place. It seems their "spies" in Iran had stole some documents from a particular Mosque. Details are not available how this came about. What is puzzling the Australian Military Intelligence is not the actual objective as stated in this report, but how the hell did an exact copy of a true incident in the field that was on their most secret files in a "Fort Knox" type security environment, a report written by one of their undercover type military intelligence operatives in Australia who has never been to Iran, how could this get into the hands of some religious scholar in Iran? While they do not suspect the officer involved, in fact they trust him beyond anything anyone can imagine, requesting an impartial neuro-psych evaluation is part of standard military intelligence procedure in such a situation. So, they had asked you to work out the state-of-mind present at the time of the incident this report is about, of the officer leading this small flock on a field operation. You are told some basic information such as that there are some puzzling aspects to this. For some reason, the actual report on file was changed to read as a story - except it is so exact and precise with the actual report on file in terms of what had happened and how, that the inescapable conclusion is that particular secret file had been ransacked. The other slightly puzzling aspect is that soldiers in the field may use slang names or brand names for say what you would call binoculars or field glasses or items of this nature. The actual file contained little information about these but did have some, and yet in the story that you are about to read, the slang or brand names have been changed to common names. For example, say "get jodie and see" was changed to "use your field glasses and look." This should not make much difference but it might so if you get stuck, consider a substitution had been made. Again, bear in mind, you are a medical doctor with a special skill - not a military police who want to find how the hell Iran got this, or military analysts who can make sense of why perhaps the objective is written as it is. Focus on your mission.. Your instructions are only to map the state-of-mind of the officer in this story, who is called "General" in the tale even though in ordinary life he wasn't. Also, hypothetically, imagine this is as true as you can imagine in that this is the actual document found but for many reasons we have changed some specifics. In other words, this is a true document - but the military did not want you, a non-military expert, to see some terms or words and also have rephrased some parts so you can understand some things in a simple way. In other words, a certain bias may have been introduced into the story by this changes. You also reflect and wonder if the military is seriously interested in the state-of-mind of the officer involved, or in fact in the state-of-mind of the Muslim cleric who wrote the objective and then translated a confidential and top secret military file record into a tale. You also suspect, or wonder, if the term 'holiness' may have, in the worst scenario, been in fact something like "Osama Bin Laden". (That is, just reflect on why the military, as you suspect, changed the wording of the objective to disguise the true intent and the recipient.) In other words, when you are dealing with people who keep secrets, such as larger corporations, police, military, Mafia, Vatican, whoever, what you are getting may be modified and while perhaps minimal modification takes place, the result is that it might make what you receive a touch "more bizarre" or "unusual" or "suspect" when you read in the "natural sense" state of mind. In fact, this type of approach can make you laugh, or vomit depending on what it is about (eg. actual letter from a serial murderer but for some reason the FBI, or equivalent, is not going to show you that asis but insists what they gave you is reasonably close. This type of approach is one hell of a problem for any neuro-psychiatrist because whose "state of mind" are you actually seeing? - the person who, for example, is the serial killer or the agent trying desperately to work out something about the serial killed. This is called a "double bias". Another thing to bear in mind that in this situation, the miliary might get someone who is not in the army, to rewrite the whole thing - so you can not easily identify that it came from the army, in case you somehow pass this to another psychiatrist or even publish a case study based on the information given to you. And on top of this it might be a translation from one language into another and then back again into the original language. In other words, there are some true challenges when dealing with some "requests" that do not give you the original but "something similar to the original" - do the best you can is my advice, without worrying too much about being too thorough about your analysis. |