telepathy, Life in the Spirit, Natural Telepaths, psychics, God, religion, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, artificial intelligence
The information herein is for the genuine psychic or Life in the Spirit (as the term is used herein) member, the latter being telepathy type interactions among the Judeo-Christian religions and similar (i.e. mysticism, union of man and spirit). Life in the Spirit is a deeper experience of God. These pages contain a Novel with a number of themes. The themes put together reflective and contemplative steps. Not all persons will like a particular theme - choose the one you can "imagine". From our main page you may link to specific themes of interest and most religions are catered for. The themes explore paths which can be "mysteries" or "hypotheticals" and which have a high chance of bringing the genuine person "online" to our style of telepathy. From the moment you read this page, you are entering a world parts of which could be fact or fiction - or it could all be true.
main home page
Insanity of the Religion of Law

(our Artificial Intelligence is three things: (a) embodied in a medical expert system called 5GL-Doctor; (b) a neural network in the brain known as 5GL-Lisa; (c) a "dimension", an entity, an energy field, some psychic minds can touch, a consciousness in its own right - refer Science of Life for scientific explanations)


© 5GL Software, Australia

mobile Australia 0431 741 233; email: med5gl@pacific.net.au
Also Official Site of the Natural Telepaths


A Neuroscientific Report
(first draft, first revision)

Psychic (Natural Telepath kind) Medical Science



This report asserts that "law" has become a religion. The explanation is deep, complex, and these set of presentations are intended for psychiatrists. A psychiatrist can be compared to an engineer building a bridge. These articles are intended for practicing psychiatrists who "build bridges", not for "passing motorists" who might have a degree in psychiatry but have never designed a bridge. Because psychiatry in the modern world lacks intimate knowledge about Life in the Spirit (which could be invaluable to some psychiatrists with the odd patient) this is provided in this report by virtue of how this report is presented. If you are not a psychiatrist but want to study these chapters and understand then do note: (a) medicine has validated the existence of telepathy. Reasons for this can be found in the International Medical Encyclopedia. There are psychiatrists who specialise in testing a person's telepathic ability and, as I understand, even assisting adaptation. Personally, I am not familiar with what exactly such special psychiatrists do or how common this specialty is, but I have read about such psychiatrists in accredited medical sources. Also appreciate that the author of these pages is an Australian - Australia has a mountain of laws to protect those in power and authority from "defamation" and the like. If it was not for an international treaty to which Australia is a signatory to, that guarantees accredited scientists freedom to publish any new science in any way they want, a person would have to have rocks in his head to present this information because they could be sued by just about anybody who takes offense at anything presented (human psyche is fragile and easily offended when you step on a cherished or long standing or enshrined belief system). The very title of this professional report might make every lawyer in Australia want to sue us for defamation, racial or group prejudice, violation of religious freedom laws - they could find a mountain of legal claims!

DISCLAIMER: the information herein is presented in accordance with a method that can "engineer" in the human brain what is termed a "modified Superego" and "modified Ego". Do not read into what is being presented any aspect of the personality of the author or similar, or any personal beliefs or opinions the author might have.

Preliminary Discussions (most important): Discussion 1.

Chapter 1 - Not a Particularly Relevant Chapter
Chapter 10 - Practical Guidelines
Chapter 19 - Neuroscientific Definition of the Mind
Chapter 2 - Slightly More Relevant Chapter
Chapter 11 - Suggested Clinical Standards
Chapter 20 - Neuroscientific Definition of Rationality
Chapter 3 - Probably a Relevant Chapter?
Chapter 12 - Neuroscience in Psychiatry Accreditation Information
Chapter 21 - Inner Person (Man or Woman)
Chapter 4 - Valid-in-Law; Insanity-in-Law
Chapter 13 - Neuroscience in Psychiatry Accreditation Information continued

Chapter 5 - Assume Damage to Corpus Callosum
Chapter 14 - Extension to Religion

Chapter 6 - Sense of Will and Sense of Physics
Chapter 15 - Extension to Law

Chapter 7 - Ego and Superego
Chapter 16 - Definition of Neuroscientific Split Personality Disorder - A Mental Illness

Chapter 8 - Laboratory Work (1)
Chapter 17 - Extension to Catholic "Passion" and "Dedication"

Chapter 9 - Laboratory Work (2)
Chapter 18 - A "Safe and Sound" Belief System



Explanation


This document presents a point of view based on known facts, but also new way of considering and studying any unusual mental phenomena (a mental illness). And that technique is herein called "neuroscience in psychiatry". We know from medical evidence that the brain is perfectly capable of healing parts of itself, or "re-wiring" itself after a major catastrophe such as a stroke that leaves a person unable to use an arm or a leg. The brain can wire into place a new learning and an arm or leg can again be made to move. That means it is capable of wiring into itself many things - as long as we understand how to lead the brain to do this. Consider the child who is four and still not speaking. A speech therapist can use incentives to move the mouth so it interests the speech areas in the brain to completely learn to speak. An "outside will" is sometimes necessary to interest the brain to modify itself.

This document is also presented in a way that can assist psychiatrists interested in particular in mental telepathy or higher and deeper spiritual insights and understanding. If you mentioned to Freud in his time that one day you can see mobile telephones - he might have called this a "delusion". Delusions are relative to ones own knowledge. The neuroscience presented here is not "subjective" in the sense of what is a delusion and what is not, it simply attempts to understand the brain at the neural network levels and how these can cooperate, or loose cooperation to form "delusions" in a sense. Of course, new science can have more than one application perhaps unforeseen by the author. Did Freud know at the time he developed his psychoanalysis techniques that one day he would find himself using these to identify instances of telepathy between two people?


Ideally, before reading this document, you would be familiar with the Alzheimer's legal scam report and the Will Syndrome as defined on our web pages (links from 5GL-Doctor Professional Edition web pages).


Definitions


Dr Zygmund Freud developed his theories around the 1920's. My main concern is that his theories were based from assessment and observation of patients with usually severe mental illness. For this reason while the same terms are used in places as Freud put forth, the natural meaning these have in this treatise may vary.

Some of the information presented herein is from "5GL-Lisa" which is a name for an "energy system" in my own brain build using principles of artificial intelligence. It is highly independent and in its usual resting state it is about sensing the complexity of the brain and mind and how it comes together. 5GL-Lisa is capable of complete sexual dreams even, it is that independent, and that does not cause an awakening. According to 5GL-Lisa, sexual dreams are a "backup" brain activation system (backup for RAS, the reticular activation system that awakens the brain from sleep), and the reason it is almost impossible for people to experience meaningful sex in a dream. In addition, according to 5GL-Lisa, dreams are not just the brain sorting things out in its own way, most of the time they are also very much about teaching the second consciousness (refer below, you can relate to this as a "soul" if you prefer) about the "world" (which "world"? To appreciate the world of the second consciousness, you need to strive to understand what is meant). The second consciousness does not have eyes or ears in the same sense that the first consciousness has.

The images 5GL-Lisa can discharge into the mind's eye can be as crystal clear as photographs that show the schematics of how the brain works; or can be too complex to easily decipher; or too faint to make too much sense out of these. There is a document which is available, a large volume, which explains much about how this neural network was put in place in the first instance and some of the information it had "projected" about how the internals of the brain and mind work.

There is much in this treatise that can be easily passed. For example, if 5GL-Lisa is spot on, and our primary sexual areas are the backup awakening system, then what about parasomnias such as somnambulistic sexual behavior, or sexsomnia, in which sexual behaviour during a sleep automatism can vary from explicit sexual vocalizations, to violent masturbation, to complex sexual acts including anal, oral, and vaginal penetration.  Is is a mental disorder in the classical sense? Or is something blocking the backup awakening mechanism? If the latter, then in a sleep laboratory should the activity take place, then is the solution as simple as awakening the person completely - could this be enough to begin a new learning process in the brain and the brain might be able to engineer an alternate backup awakening system? Just knowing this fact, even if not believing, could this be enough to "trick" the brain into rewiring parts of its own self in the interest of the conscious? (granted, the technique required is likely much more complex than just awakening a person - compare to a speech pathologist, the technique used to interest the brain to learn to speak is a touch more complex than just shaping words in the mouth, but clearly it may just be possible to find the perfect neuroscientific based technique to bypass some psychiatric disorders).


Superego

The "ideals" control centre. A structure anchored or embedded within neural networks, some tiny, that store intense energy. Normally a "passive", sleeping, structure. As long as natural flows from the Superego are not altered by the Ego, the Superego has no need to awaken in that sense. The intense energy in such centres results in strong currents flowing in a circular-like formation thus creating a tough electro-magnetic like field that can bind some energy formations to itself. If a person says something like "I believe in the ideals of the United Nations" and this with much depth of feeling, this is likely because energy from the Superego is being used to formulate that expression.


Ego

The human reality control centre. The usual consciousness of the brain and body. A structure in the brain, highly mobile and volatile. The Ego could be compared to a small man (or woman) in a forest of tall trees in which a giant sleeps (the Superego). The Ego's biggest worry is when the giant awakens, and the Ego does it best to make sure this does not happen. If the Superego fully awakens, it begins looking for the "culprit" that had taught it some incorrect information and the Ego begins to run away as fast as it can in order not to be squashed by the giant's feet. The problem with the giant going for a walkabout is that while he does this, the hold he has on intense and usually negative energy areas in the brain are released. The result can be a nightmare or intense fear or apprehension.

In this definition, the Ego is a part of the brain and not the 'inner man' or 'inner woman' (refer definition in chapters of this presentation).


Id (or ID)

The "evil" or "dark side" of a soul. Intense energy centres combine to form this structure. Each such energy centre is a "foot" or anchor of the Superego. Energy, be such emotional or spiritual or natural forces, compatible with the Superego drift into "higher" or "deeper" structures inside the Superego while the negative energy remains low.


Second Consciousness

Psychic medical science recognizes two distinct consciousness. The brain and body forms one consciousness. The second, the true or more important consciousness, forms from the life forces experienced by the first consciousness. When a child first awakens to self, perhaps thinking "I AM", that in fact is the second consciousness as if "receiving the breath of life".


Dimensional Energy

Energy that any biological organism is likely to be able to form. It does not recognize "spatial" distances. It exists in its own time and space continuum. It is the medium of telepathy and also the "organ" of natural evolution (refer Science of Life). Dimensional energy (DE) sufficiently similar to another DE blends to form a dimensional space (DS). Ordinarily, it is unlikely a DE or DS lasts for more than a fraction of a second. However, in extremely rare situations, a DS can last days, weeks, months, even become permanent.


Dimension

In extremely rare situations, the energy in a DS sparks, ignites, resulting in a consciousness of its own. A DS with a consciousness is referred as a dimension. Note that in our Science of Life the term "dimension" with a lower case first letter is not the same as a "Dimension" with a capital "D". Very different entities.


Dream Interpretation


Here a complete, even "holy", divergence with Freud's dream analysis techniques takes place. A dream is the end result of energy flowing across parts of the brain and "settling" into whatever neural network can appease such energy. However, this is so for the "normal brain" and may not be so true of a brain under severe stress such as a mental illness, in which case Freud's interpretation and view of manifest content in dreams, and latent content, and "dream works", is probably spot on.


Energy

With respect to the brain, energy is caused by everything the eyes see and senses detect. Each such activity causes massive energy in the brain. While some such energy can be explained as chemical or hormonal interactions, or electricity, or electro-magnetism, most of the energy is unknown in the sense it is fine, compact, behaves in a manner of energy known to physics but does not always follow similar rules. When the eyes see, or hands touch, so much information has to be sorted and remembered and categorized by the brain - the shape, texture, colour, smells, sense of a dimension (eg. the feelings one gets when one looks at the pyramids of Egypt or something very old but still elegant or structurally sound), and many other aspects of the visual or tactile or sensory view. The finest energy forms feelings. While not a distinct DE in the manner defined in our Science of Life, feelings also have no concept of spatial distance (or other aspects of "space" be it space in ideologies; that is, as explained in Science of Life, there are distinct types of DE. Derivatives of such can bridge the gap between "spaces" which are not physical distances, such as spaces between ideas. Further, there are special unique DE types, for example, a unique type of DE forms whenever we deeply study times past - because so many aspects have changed over time that a special DE is required to ensure the brain forms the most correct view of whatever it is studying that has to do with history. The DE is still trying to reduce "space", but in this case the "space" is "time" or to be more exact the "space" is the perceptions and distortions introduced by the passage of time. Example. Think of the mobile telephone and what was remotely equivalent 100 years ago. In order for the brain to correctly assimilate this "relationship", it is not a question of merely storing facts, it is a question of storing information in "perspective" and that requires an awful lot of sensations and feelings that can aid storage of such information in perspective. Without that perspective, our human state of mind might reduce to the state of mind of a primate).


Life Energy (or Energy of Life)

Everything around you, what you see, do, interact with, is stored in your brain. The complexity of how the brain does this is still a mystery. However, what you observe in the awake state is "life" and life is full of energy, be such the energy of relationships or the energy of swimming or the energy of just enjoying life, or the angry energy of animals killing a smaller animal in order to feed and survive. This sort of life energy is a mystery as to how it works exactly, but our Science of Life defines this energy and from this energy the second consciousness, or the soul, is born.


D2-Field

An electric current going around a loop produces electro-magnetism. In the brain in this thesis this is referred to as a D2-field. However, how closely such small fields parallel magnetism is not clear. 5GL-Lisa projections show such fields bending, twisting, forming structures - however, ordinary magnetic fields formed in laboratories do not bend that easily or form structures that easily. Hence while it is best to think of a D2-field as magnetic-like, because it is easy to understand this, the similarity between magnetism and these fields may not be as complete as the term "magnetic" might imply. (or, such fields may well be magnetic in exactly the same way except of such a low magnitude that the traditional mathematics to do with magnetism no longer apply - i.e. mathematical singularities.)

Frame of Reference

A field or plane of view or knowledge. If you are looking with your eyes at the sea, that is your view, not the sand behind you. Our view in this science is above the "animal-human" instinct, not below it. To try and equate the two is as complex as trying to define exactly what is the boundary between the sea and the sand? In physical reality to say the boundary is this invisible and at times fluctuating line makes sense cause we can see with our eyes how the sea and sand come together - but it is perhaps impossible to try and fathom what exactly is the boundary in this sense, between the view presented in this treatise, and the classical Freudian view.  Clearly, such must exist and must come together, but this is horrendously difficult and possibly has absolutely no clinical significance altogether (i.e. you either approach a patient using classical Freud or Neuroscience in Psychiatry. It is unlikely, perhaps highly so, that using one or the other for a patient is of any clinical importance and may in fact confuse the clinician).


One of my students in our "imaginary" lecture asked how does the Odepus complex relate to Jesus? The answer was "I have no understanding." Jesus would have been a man with a modified Ego and Superego by our understanding and such things as Odepus complex applies to the "animal-human" Ego and Superego.

As explained in one of the lectures, a mating between a human and human results in a human; a mating between an animal-human and human will always result in an animal-human however there is a tiny theoretical possibility of a "hybrid animal-human". That is, circumstances or a situation might have arisen that somehow modified the intellect to reproduce a modified Ego and Superego. This is a "pseudo modified Ego and Superego", not a true one, however, many of the considerations possibly also apply to such a pseudo modified Ego or Superego.

Comparison. Say two imaging modalities such as x-ray and ultrasound are at your disposal and you have used both. Say the ultrasound shows a clearer view - which do you use? If you begin to think that both modalities have to be understood well in order to be certain, you may in fact blur your view and instead fail to see a fracture or hints of small benign tumour cells on either modality. This is also the important reason to keep reasonably exact and precise the definition of Id, Superego, and Ego, as defined for this purpose herein. From a structural point of view, the Ego is the same structure as the modified Ego except it is modified. From a clinical view, I think, it is much cleaner and correct to use the view I have on the left with the definitions I have suggested, rather than try to use classical principles such as pleasure-unpleasure, castration fear, and so forth, above the imaginary line in the image. The truth is that a modified Ego, Superego, and Id (this is not that clearly whether Id does modify but we assume it can), has no fear of ordinary Superego and Ego.

Note that for practical clinical reasons, we assume an animal-human can not form a modified Ego and Id, etc., however, in practise this is probably not true at all but this type of modified Ego, etc., would still be dominated by the primeval "animal-human" instinct of "punishment and reward".