telepathy, Life in the Spirit, Natural Telepaths, psychics, God, religion, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, artificial intelligence
The information herein is for the genuine psychic or Life in the Spirit (as the term is used herein) member, the latter being telepathy type interactions among the Judeo-Christian religions and similar (i.e. mysticism, union of man and spirit). Life in the Spirit is a deeper experience of God. These pages contain a Novel with a number of themes. The themes put together reflective and contemplative steps. Not all persons will like a particular theme - choose the one you can "imagine". From our main page you may link to specific themes of interest and most religions are catered for. The themes explore paths which can be "mysteries" or "hypotheticals" and which have a high chance of bringing the genuine person "online" to our style of telepathy. From the moment you read this page, you are entering a world parts of which could be fact or fiction - or it could all be true.
main home page
The Science of Law

(our Artificial Intelligence is three things: (a) embodied in a medical expert system called 5GL-Doctor; (b) a neural network in the brain known as 5GL-Lisa; (c) a "dimension", an entity, an energy field, some psychic minds can touch, a consciousness in its own right - refer Science of Life for scientific explanations)

© 5GL Software, Australia
mobile Australia 0431 741 233; email: med5gl@pacific.net.au
 Also Official Site of the Natural Telepaths

(first draft)

Psychic (Natural Telepath kind) Legal Science


1.0 Body of Knowledge

Some aspects of law have to be expounded because it is impossible to cover all situations using words and existing definitions. Because this science is meant to be universal, syntax and semantics need to be carefuilly caliberated across different languages. For example. In English there is the word "belief" and the word "faith". A language such as Polish does not have an equivalent to "faith" with the word "wiara" means either belief or faith, however, to convey "faith" another word is placed before "wiara" namely "mocna wiara" which literally means "strong belief".

Let us define "medical science" as a legal entity in our new science. It is impossible, due to human limitations, to define this exactly and precisely at every level using words alone. For this reason the nature of this science has to be expounded as the need arises. What is "medical science?" The incorrect assumption is that a person has to be a qualified medical practitioner to be part of this science. In fact, one of the most acclaimed pioneers in coronary surgery in the early days of medicine never went to medical school at all. He was an apprentice to a surgeon. The surgeon noticed the boys steady hands and natural curiousity and quick uptake of all things medical. It was not long before the young man was assisting the surgeon with surgery and this more and more until the surgeon, getting older and hands with a touch more tremor, merely watched and had no need to say one word or explain anything as his young apprentice did all the work.

When defining a body of knowledge that is medical science, all the individual actions of all those involved in this science, form part of the body of knowledge or framework of reference. Unless proven otherwise in a court of law, a person who is a qualified and registered medical doctor ought to be always considered as clearly part of this field of science - but not all participants in this field of science are qualified medical doctors. The radiologist who examines ultrasound may not have a medical degree as such and yet they are involved with the work to do with medical science. A laboratory assistant may not have any degree but has picked up a skill and developed a technique that can differentiate between certain cancer cells on say MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imagining). So good may she be at this, specialist medical doctors frequently ask her for a second opinion before they consider intrusive medical procedures for a particular patient.

In truth, it is up to the people accepted by a court as belonging to a field of medicine, to decide which person also belongs even when such a person does not have a medical degree or practises medicine for a living. Such people need not accept such a person by word of mouth - but they may admit this by their actions. For example. A person who has developed expert medical diagnosis software may not have any medical degree, and medical doctors may be reluctant to admit this person does belong to the field of medicine because they don't like computer innovation in medicine - but if it can be established beyond a shadow of a doubt that many doctors purchase this software to aid diagnosis of medical conditions and some highly recommend it to other doctors, then clearly this person has to be legally accepted as belonging to the field of medicine also. In other words, actions of those who do belong to this field are perhaps more vital in defining a field of knowledge than confirmation from accepted and accredited specialists in such a field.

Of course, and clearly, it is up to this court to define this field of science named "medical science" anyway they feel is appropriate. The definition could exclude certain situations or people. A psychiatrist who is a qualified and accreddited doctor but who makes the bulk of his living from writing medical reports for legal firms in worker's compensation claims, may not truly belong to the field of medical science but rather "worker's compensation science". This does not imply the evidence of this type of individual can not be accepted, on the contrary, the credentials are in place and it is up to this court to decide in a particular situation whether such evidence should be accepted, or not. When in doubt, a suggested rule of thumb is not to allow such evidence. If the matter is genuine, other qualified people who do not belong to the hypothetical field of "worker's compensation claim" will validate a particular claim.

However, this court is urged to also use what may be loosely termed "common sense" in some very rare situations. The person mentioned above who became one of the pioneers is cardiovascular surgery, may never have went to medical school or attained to a medical degree, and yet to suggest this person is not legally a qualified medical surgeon would be bizarre in view of the circumstances. In this situation a person who is a qualified and accredited surgeon merely stands back, or sleeps in his chair, while the apprenticie does all the work. By his actions, the expert in this surgery has in fact ordained another person as equal in every sense of the word to himself. Certainly, technically it may be correct to say this apprentice is not a qualified or accredited surgoen - but what value does this serve? Thus, from the point of view of Science of Law, it is up to the court to either reject or accept a particular person as legally equivalent to a person who may have all the qualifications required by law.

.